Subscribe

Tax reform is possible, but not easy

Substantial tax reform may still be possible, but not easy. The biggest hurtle isn't in forming a comprehensive plan, which has been done before, but in selling it to members of congress. 

  • close
    U.S. President George W. Bush reaches for a baby after delivering remarks during a campaign stop in Canton, Ohio July 31, 2004. George Bush created a panel for tax reform, but their findings never gained traction.
    Mannie Garcia/Reuters/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

At a Tax Policy Center conference on tax reform yesterday, Jason Furman, the chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, said that a major rewrite of the tax code would make little progress until Congress breaks the current impasse over the treatment of pass-throughs-- firms such as partnerships and S corporations whose owners pay tax on their individual tax returns.

Furman said there was more potential for action on the corporate side, where policymakers have broadly agreed to reduce U.S. corporate tax rates. But even that effort faces a big hurdle: The biggest beneficiaries of corporate rate cuts would be big multinational firms but most proposals to pay for those rate reductions would eliminate tax preferences that benefit both corporations and pass-throughs. Those pass-throughs, which make up the vast majority of US businesses, would aggressively oppose such a trade-off.

Yesterday’s conference commemorated the 10th  anniversary of President George W. Bush’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.  That bipartisan group, led by former senators John Breaux (D-LA) and Connie Mack (R-FL), also included economists and business executives. And it developed two plans for broad-based reform, a simplified income tax and a business cash-flow tax. Both were credible, well-designed ideas, but the commission report got no support from the Bush Administration or Congress and went nowhere.

Recommended: Top ten highest rated CEOs of 2015 are not the ones you would expect

Still, many of its ideas have surfaced in more recent tax proposals, including several made this year by the major GOP presidential candidates. The one big difference: The Tax Panel’s plan raised the same amount of money as the then-tax code (under the assumption that the 2001-03 tax cuts would be made permanent). Today’s versions are all enormous tax cuts.

A panel of commission veterans agreed that it may be possible, though hardly easy, to enact broad-based reform. However, they candidly acknowledged the hurdles, some of which may be higher today than in 2005.

MIT economist Jim Poterba said that two big economic changes in the past decade complicate reform because they create what may be conflicting goals.

On one hand, persistent slow growth in the US economy increases demand for pro-growth reform, which would include lower taxes on capital income (though Poterba acknowledged that evidence for exactly what changes would best accomplish those goals is weak). On the other hand, growing concerns about income inequality make it more difficult to reduce taxes on capital, which could boost after-tax inequality.

Following the public program, TPC’s Leadership Council met to discuss many of these issues. The council is made up of business leaders and other outside experts who advise TPC and make unrestricted financial contributions to the center.

As Jason noted, there is widespread support for corporate rate cuts. What there is not, however, is any consensus on how to finance those cuts without adding the budget deficit . At the leadership council meeting,  my colleague Eric Toder outlined four possible options: 1) eliminating business tax expenditures (2) enacting other measures to raise taxes from businesses such as limiting the deductibility of interest or requiring large pass-throughs to pay corporate income tax,  3)raising tax rates on capital gains and dividends or 4) enacting a new revenue source, such as a carbon tax or a value-added tax.

While each of those approaches may have policy merit, none has anything close to enough political support to make business reform happen.

Is all lost? Not necessarily, former Senator Breaux, a long-time member of the Senate Finance Committee, told the morning conference. Developing a credible plan is not the biggest challenge, he said. The Bush commission and others have already done that. The challenge is to wrap the idea of reform around a simple, compelling story that lawmakers can understand. As Breaux put it, “You’ve got to be able to sell it to members of Congress who don’t know the difference between a balance sheet and a tax return.”

That seems easy enough.

This article first appeared at TaxVox.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK