Subscribe

Can states boost growth by cutting individual tax rates for the rich?

Certain lawmakers think states can generate powerful economic growth by cutting income tax rates, especially top rates. But does economic research support the claim?

  • close
    A money changer counts US dollar bills at a currency exchange office in central Istanbul. The effects of state taxes on economic growth are ambiguous at best, Gleckman argues, and those who firmly believe that tax cuts solve all woes will be disappointed.
    Murad Sezer/Reuters/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

States can generate powerful economic growth by cutting income tax rates.

That, at least, is the theory behind a recent wave of tax cuts, or proposed tax cuts, around the country. Kansas has cut taxes repeatedly in recent years. So has Wisconsin. In Maine, Governor Paul LePage vows to repeal his state’s income tax entirely.  But does economic research support the claim? Can a state boost growth by cutting income tax rates, especially top tax rates. Or conversely, would it retard growth by raising them?

A new paper by my Tax Policy Center colleagues Bill Gale, Aaron Krupkin, and Kim Rueben concludes the answer is “no” to both questions.  In the cautious language of academic research: “Our results are inconsistent with the view that cuts in top state income tax rates will automatically or necessarily generate growth.”

Recommended: Taxes in 2015: 7 changes and 9 weird deductions

But Bill, Aaron, and Kim also have a warning for those who assert that cutting state taxes is good for growth or raising them is bad: All taxes are not alike. It turns out that while individual income taxes don’t matter much at all, and corporate taxes may actually boost growth a bit, higher property taxes do seem linked to slower growth though even that relationship seems to change over time.

The relationship between state individual tax rates and economic growth is enormously controversial, not only among policymakers but also among economists. There has been much research but little consensus. For instance, Will McBride at the Tax Foundation reviewed the literature and concluded that tax cuts are unassailably good for growth. Michael Mazerov at The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities looked at studies and found no clear benefit.

To better understand the effects of state taxes on growth, Bill, Aaron, and Kim tried an experiment. They started with a model developed by Bob Reed (then of the University of Oklahoma, now at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand—btw, good choice on his part). Reed wrote a National Tax Journal paper in 2008 called The Robust Relationship Between Taxes and U.S. State Income Growth that has become something of a touchstone for backers of state tax cuts. By using a series of five-year observations from 1970 to 1999, Reed found that increasing tax state revenues correlate to slowing economic growth.

The TPC authors first redid Reed’s analysis for 1977-2001, but then made several adjustments. They added two more observations for each state—for 2006 and 2011--which covered a period of strong economic growth and the Great Recession. They also looked more closely at what was going on inside the time period, broke down revenue changes by different kinds of taxes, and adjusted state tax rates for federal deductibility of state taxes.  Finally, they looked at the effects of all these tax changes on business creation and employment.

And they found…a muddle.

For instance, from 1977-2001 (roughly the period Reed studied) high state tax revenues did slow firm formation. But when they looked out to 2006 or 2011, the effects largely disappeared.

When they looked at top marginal rates, the story was even more confusing. In some years, increases in these rates seemed to slow new business creation. In other years, start-ups increased even when rates rose.

The evidence for employment was just as shaky. High tax revenues do correlate to weak employment in most years, but barely. And the longer the time frame, the less important they seem. Raising marginal tax rates doesn’t matter either.

The one exception: Property tax revenues, which did seem to have a statistically significant impact on growth. The authors suggest more research to learn what’s going on, and why.

As policy analysis, this paper tells an important story: The effects of state taxes on economic growth are ambiguous at best.  Those who firmly believe that tax cuts solve all woes will be disappointed.

If this paper were a novel, it would be terrible. No drama. But it is still an important read for policymakers and tax wonks. Maybe somebody should send a copy to Paul LePage before it is too late.

The post Can States Boost Growth By Cutting Top Individual Tax Rates? appeared first onTaxVox.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK