The economy is not a zero sum game

One country's economic success does not have to come at the expense of others

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    Texas Rangers shortstop Elvis Andrus during the game between the Boston Red Sox and the Texas Rangers at the Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, Texas, on Wednesday. Unlike in sports, one economy succeeding doesn't have t come at the expense of another failing.
    View Caption

A good example of a zero sum game is a sports game. In every match or tournament, every team's (or player's in individualist sports like tennis or golf) success comes at the expense of other team's. There can only be 8 teams that for example make it to the quarter finals in the World Cup, meaning that the other 8 teams in the group stage must by necessity lose. And of the 8 teams that made it to the quarter finals, only 4 can make it to the semi finals, meaning that the other 4 teams must lose. And only 2 of the 4 teams in the semi finals can make it to the final, meaning that the other 2 must lose. And in the final, only one team can win while the other must lose.

Now left-liberal blogger Matthew Yglesias thinks that this is a good analogy for the economy. He argues that Estonia's success in turning its economy around can't be replicated in all the other countries with deep economic problems because there is supposedly only a "finite level of demand" that nations are competing for, and that therefore Estonia's success has been achieved at the expense of others, just like victories in sport championships are achieved at the expense of other teams.

There are 3 reasons why this is wrong. First of all, though it is true that trade – and current account balances are zero sum games on a global level it is certainly not one at the Euro area level as the Euro area is only a limited part of the world.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

And furthermore, reductions in external deficits in for example Greece and Portugal or increases in the Estonian surplus can be achieved by reductions in the large surpluses of for example Germany, Holland and Finland.

And secondly, Estonia's 8.4% growth has not been achieved through higher net exports. In fact, Estonia's trade and current account surplus has been somewhat lower this year than the previous year.

And thirdly and perhaps most importantly, it is not true that there is only a finite level of demand and that economic growth is therefore a zero sum game. When new productive activities are performed, it is not just supply but also demand that increases. That is why "aggregate demand" always increases during for example periods of technological progress, and that is also why for example the strong increase in exports in Estonia has been associated with just as strong (in fact, slightly stronger) increase in imports.

That is why following the Estonian role model would be good for Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and Spain-and why that would help and not hurt the rest of Europe as well.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. This post originally ran on stefanmikarlsson.blogspot.com.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...