Subscribe

Stock market naysayers paint an incomplete picture

Some in the financial media say a stock market correction is inevitable. That prediction is intriguing, but it has a few subtle, yet gaping holes. 

  • close
    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange February 24, 2015. Even if it pans out, Allaria argues, talk of an eventual correction shouldn't rattle disciplined stock market investors.
    Brendan McDermid/Reuters/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption
of

Are we standing at the precipice after a strong uphill climb in the world of investing, or does it just seem that way to some market observers?

Interest rates have lingered near all-time lows, meaning that the rate of return on fixed-income bond funds may languish for the foreseeable future. In addition, U.S. stock markets are hitting new all-time highs regularly, leading some experts to suggest we can enjoy this bull run for only so long before we see another market correction. Some in the financial media portray this inevitable correction as a doomsday event that could surpass the Great Recession of 2008-2009.

While this prediction makes for intriguing headlines, the overall plot has a few subtle, yet gaping holes.

Over the past 10 years, the U.S. stock market has been seen as both a monstrous demon and a heaven-sent catalyst for investors. By this time, we’re all too familiar with the 38% drop in the S&P 500 in 2008. But we may not be as familiar with the unwavering tear that the S&P has been on since that time, earning approximately 25%, 15%, 2%, 16%, 32%, and 12% from 2009 to 2014, respectively, according to Morningstar.

Since February 2013, when the S&P reached a new all-time high, we’ve heard the same story again and again from some in the financial media: that a major correction is near. This may be true, but if you heeded that notion by keeping your portfolio mostly or entirely in cash for the past two years, you know by now that you missed out in a very big way.

We reached new all-time highs in the S&P 500 in 2013, 2014 and now 2015. What we’ve seen is that even after some of the most dismal times (2008-2009), the stock market has proven that it has no predictable ceiling.

For long-term investors, and for those who showed strong discipline by staying in the market during the 2008-2009 decline, we’ve seen that it is possible to bounce back from even the worst of times. Assuming that nobody actually owns the coveted “stock market crystal ball,” and knows how and when to time market events, all we can do is remain well-diversified and let time in the market do the rest.

Contrary to the false ceilings, we are experiencing true “floors” in the interest rate environment. Let me stop you and your brain right there, because although I just said we are experiencing true floors, I did not say interest rates are going to rise at warp speed and every fixed-income investment out there is completely worthless. I’m simply pointing out that when the 10-year U.S. Treasury is hovering at or around 2%, there just isn’t much room for it to drop much lower. So what does that mean for investors?

For that, let’s go back to 1948. In that year, one-month T-bills sat at 0.8%. From 1948 to 1981, we saw one-month T-bills rise from 0.8% to over 15%. During that interest rate bull market, long-term corporate bonds saw a return of 2.7% over a 33-year period. Compare that to a return of 10.2% from 1982-2013.

What this means is that for the past three decades, while interest rates were falling, bond investors saw favorable returns. Over the next 30 years, that may not be the case. While interest rates are certainly low, that doesn’t necessarily mean they will begin another climb to 15%. If we study Japan’s economic situation, we see that rates could potentially be flat for quite some time. The truth that we face is that fixed-income investments will be hard-pressed to deliver a return similar to what we saw over the past 30 years.

With these factors in mind, investors should consider what this means for their portfolios. This may include reconsidering the amount of volatility we are willing to accept in exchange for a more favorable, long-term rate of return. This may also include reconsidering what we feel is a fair, realistic, long-term rate of return, especially for balanced portfolios that may consist of 40% bonds. And perhaps while you consider this information, I’ll continue looking for my crystal ball.

Learn more about Joe on NerdWallet’s Ask an Advisor

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best personal finance bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome
 
 
Make a Difference
Inspired? Here are some ways to make a difference on this issue.
FREE Newsletters
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
 

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK