US financial stress back to Enron scandal days. Hooray!?

An index of financial stress has plunged since last year's panic, but remains near highs reached in the aftermath of the Enron scandal.

By , Guest blogger

  • close
    The level of financial stress continues its downturn from the panic of a year ago, but the US is still near levels seen in the aftermath of the Enron scandal in 2003.
    View Caption

The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis recently began publishing a new weekly index that seeks to track the general level of financial stress.

As periods of financial stress come and go a whole host of fundamental economic indicators immediately adjust to meet the near and long term expectations of market participants

Interest rates, yields spreads, popular market volatility indices all move in real time giving observers unequivocal evidence of changes general sentiment.

The St. Louis Fed has devised a method of crunching eighteen of these sensitive indices down into one convenient index it calls the St. Louis Fed Financial Stress Index (STLFSI).

The latest results of the STLFSI indicates that the level of financial stress is continuing its trend down from the epic levels seen during the fall of 2008 but remains elevated with respect to typical levels.

At a value of 0.8 the current level of financial stress is roughly equivalent to late-2003 following the Enron/WorldCom debacle and remains nearly as elevated as period surrounding the 1998 Russian debt crisis and Long Term Capital Management.

Add/view comments on this post.

Recommended: Could you pass a US citizenship test?

--------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...