Chevrolet Impala vs. Dodge Charger: Which full-size sedan takes the cake?

Full-size sedans have to be spacious and comfortable, and a reasonable price wouldn't hurt, either. The Chevrolet Impala and the Dodge Charger each take different routes to that formula. 

|
General Motors/AP/FIle
the 2014 Chevrolet Impala 2.5L iVLC.

The formula for the full-size sedan is pretty simple. It has to be spacious and comfortable, and a reasonable price wouldn't hurt, either.

The two cars we are pitting against each other here each take different routes to that formula. The Chevrolet Impala opts for front-wheel drive and 4-cylinder or V-6 power, while the Dodge Charger goes with rear- or all-wheel drive and V-6 or V-8 power. Both work well, but which is best for you? Let's dig deeper to find out.

Both cars are equally attractive. The Impala's crisply themed sheet metal has a bit of Mercedes CLS in its rear quarters. Most cars are best approached from the front, but the elegance and sophistication of the Impala is best appreciated from the rear. Inside, the dash is ambitious, if not quite as unified. The designers shaved away unneeded dash below the beltline, but the chorus of lines, textures, and materials needs a more muted approach.

The Charger combines elements of old muscle car styling with a modern aesthetic. The Coke-bottle shape is right out of the '60s, but the car also has the short overhangs and large wheels of a modern performance sedan. The cabin features subtle surfacing, contrasting matte metallic framing accents, and plenty of soft-touch materials.

Powertrains and performance

Performance a point in the Charger's favor, mostly because it offers V-8 power and some high-performance models.

Nonetheless, with its 305-horsepower 3.6-liter V-6, the Impala is a sleek, athletic performer. It accelerates to 60 mph in about 6.8 seconds. Handling and comfort are balanced, and the ride is damped extremely well. Base Impalas carry a 196-hp 2.5-liter inline-4 that moves the car along smartly enough under most circumstances but struggles during hard acceleration.

The Charger's base Pentastar 3.6-liter V-6, which produces 292 hp, is all you need for keeping ahead of traffic and offers similar performance to the Chevy V-6. One step up from there is the R/T, with its 370-hp 5.7-liter V-8. The 5.7 starts to make the Charger feel like a muscle car.

Buyers can also opt for a pair of models with a 485-hp 6.4-liter V-8 that can vault the Charger from 0 to 60 mph in the mid four-second range, as well as the ridiculous 707-hp SRT Hellcat. The Hellcat accelerates to 60 mph in just 3.7 seconds on its way to a holy-rolling top speed of 204 mph.

Even in the V-8 models, the Charger's ride quality is on the firm side, but quite comfortable.

Of course, all that power comes at a penalty to fuel economy. With the 5.7, the Charger returns a mediocre 16/25/19 mpg. The 6.4 is rated at 18 mph combined and the Hellcat gets 16 mpg combined.

The V-6 models offer very similar fuel economy, though. The Impala is rated at 19/29/22 mpg, while the V-6 Charger returns 19/31/23 mpg. The most fuel efficient of the group is the 4-cylinder Impala, which gets EPA ratings of 22/31/25 mpg.

Interior comfort and quality

We give the nod to the Impala for interior comfort and quality. The front seats are supportive, and space is vast through the back seat, except in headroom. The trunk is large at 18.8 cubic feet. Despite some quality materials, the Impala's busy look keeps the cabin from feeling upscale.

The Charger's interior materials and trims are excellent, with plenty of soft-touch materials and impressive switchgear. Big doors and elongated roofline make getting in and out of both rows easy. The front seats are wide and well bolstered, but rear legroom is a little tight for long-legged people. Unfortunately, the high window line creates a bathtub-type feel, hurting outward visibility. 

Features and safety

Both the Impala and the Charger are well equipped, with similar prices, and they offer about the same level of safety.

Impala prices range from about $28,000 for the base model all the way to $41,000. The highlight of Impala's interior features is the MyLInk infotainment system, which is run through an 8.0-inch touchscreen and offers Apple Car Play compatibility. MyLInk is easy to use, and offers pinch, swipe, and voice-to-text capability.

The Charger lineup is more expansive, starting with a $28,000 SE V-6 model and ranging all the way up to the $66,000 Hellcat. Like the Impala, the Charger offers a top-notch infotainment system. It's called Uconnect and it comes with an 8.4-inch touchscreen and a drag-and-drop menu bar. Other notable features include Dodge's "heritage" color options, and a series of stripes and appearance packages.

Safety is a strong suit for both cars, but crash test scores could be better. The Impala comes standard with 10 airbags and can be fitted with blind-spot monitors, lane-departure warning, and forward collision warning. It's earned a top five-star overall rating from the federal government, but has only partial scores from the IIHS.

The Charger also gets five stars from the government, but receives a "Marginal" score in the IIHS's small front overlap crash test. Buyers can get the same active safety features as the Impala, plus rear cross-traffic alert and lane-keep assist.

Counting up the points, this contest ends in a tie. The Impala's front-drive approach gives it the win for interior comfort and quality, while the Charger's rear-drive layout and high-horsepower models push it ahead in terms of performance. Which you choose should be based on which of those qualities you find most important.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chevrolet Impala vs. Dodge Charger: Which full-size sedan takes the cake?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0514/Chevrolet-Impala-vs.-Dodge-Charger-Which-full-size-sedan-takes-the-cake
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe