Anti-dumping policies can have environmental consequences
Anti-dumping laws don't protect the environment in every industry. In some cases, such restrictions can actually do harm.
Maybe Adam Smith and Alfred Marshall didn't figure out all of micro theory. Consider the case of solar panel imports from China. The NY Times reports that the U.S is imposing a large tariff punishment on these imports. This will hurt Chinese exporters and U.S importers and help U.S producers of panels but it will also impose a global pollution externality. A side benefit of the U.S being able to import cheap solar panels is that this increases their adoption and this reduces global GHG emissions. In the presence of such a consumption positive externality, does this affect how we think about the economics of dumping? The irony here is that environmentalists should support Chinese dumping (i.e. China selling their green products in the U.S for a really low price).Skip to next paragraph
Mathew is an economics professor at UCLA and has written three books: Green Cities (Brookings Institution Press); Heroes and Cowards (Princeton University Press, jointly with Dora L. Costa); and in fall 2010, Climatopolis: How Our Cities Will Thrive in the Hotter World (Basic Books).
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
As I understand the economics of dumping, regulators are concerned that exporter prices low now to kill off domestic competition and once the U.S firms are dead will sharply raise prices to monopoly levels and gouge the silly Americans. Most Chicago economists do not believe this logic. If China did achieve market power and tried to take advantage of it, this would trigger entry by some other developing nation who could cheaply mass produce that solar panel technology. The "pro-dumpers" implicitly assume that there is some future barrier to entry that prohibits entry into the industry. That sounds silly to me.
To repeat this blog post's key point. With most goods such as cars, when we import a car there is actually a negative pollution externality so "anti-dumping" laws protect the environment. In the case of products that offer positive externality benefits, environmentalists should be bigger fans of free trade and oppose tariffs on such products! Free trade and the environment baby! Think about it.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on greeneconomics.blogspot.com.