For these four nations, 2012 is worse than the Great Recession

4. China

Stringer/Reuters
A worker frowns amidst dust inside an open-air plant that crushes rocks to produce construction materials in Aksu, Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, China, in mid-September. China's economic slowdown is expected to reach its nadir this quarter, leaving growth for 2012 likely to fall below 8 percent, a level unseen since 1999, a Reuters poll showed.

This is the biggest surprise of all. The Great Recession cut China’s real GDP growth by a third – down to 9.2 percent in 2009, according to the IMF – before it rebounded. But China this year is growing at an even slower pace: 7.5 to 8.0 percent, according to various estimates.

Much of this decline is deliberate: Beijing tightened lending to try to tame inflation, which was pushing up food and housing prices; now, it’s trying to loosen some of its control to make sure growth doesn’t fall too far. In many ways, China is paying the price for having engineered its recovery from the recession with a huge stimulus. Housing prices have soared. All the loans have created the potential for bad debt.

“You have this credit bubble still hanging over the economy, so that limits the government’s ability to stimulate the economy,” says Todd Lee, senior director of global economics at IHS/Global Insight, an economic research firm in Lexington, Mass.

A growing number of analysts think China’s growth will decline even more as exports fall, especially those destined for recession-plagued Europe. “Things have become more precarious,” Mr. Lee says, but he’s holding to his forecast of 7.8 percent growth this year with a very mild recovery in 2013.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.