Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Who’s to blame for automakers’ woes?

The industry itself bears some, but not all, of the responsibility, as GM and Chrysler seek more US aid.

(Page 2 of 2)



•Losing touch with fundamentals. In many eras, recessions are times when excesses in the economy are exposed and corrected. This time is a reckoning for Detroit, with its rich union contracts and the need to ramp up the quest for more fuel-efficient technologies.
But the recession is broadly about a different kind of losing touch, in which home values decoupled from personal incomes, and investors bought mortgage securities without knowing their risks.

Skip to next paragraph

•Diminished access to credit. Car sales are down not just because people are worried about their jobs and about wealth lost in stocks or the housing market. Conditions on loans are in fact tighter, linked to stresses in the banking industry. That’s a problem throughout the economy, but a particularly acute one for carmakers.

•Pension troubles. In seeking new aid – $16.6 billion in addition to the $13.4 billion GM has already received – chief executive Rick Wagoner warned that the company may also have to ask for extra money to fill a hole in its pension fund. That’s a widespread problem in corporate America and for state and local governments. The others aren’t seeking bailouts, but many pension funds face the prospect of scrambling to fill a gap created by this past year’s stock market slide.

•Forced restructuring. Just as marketplace conditions are compelling GM and Chrysler to cut costs and reposition themselves, the same is true throughout the economy. Banks and investment firms are scaling back on leverage, or debt. Millions of households are restructuring through processes such as bankruptcy, foreclosure, or loan refinancing.

For the carmakers, the restructuring required to win new government support is massive. The plans outlined this week represent a progress report toward a March 31 deadline.

GM, in presenting its plan Tuesday, said the alternative of a restructuring in bankruptcy would be much riskier and costlier. In bankruptcy, vehicle sales might plunge, and the ripple effect on suppliers and the economy would be more severe.

“That’s what we’re trying to avoid,” says Rebecca Lindland, an auto industry analyst at the consulting firm IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Mass.

Even with government aid, the carmakers will shrink. Chrysler is cutting several nameplates, laying off 3,000 more workers, and planning an alliance with the Italian carmaker Fiat.

GM plans to sell or shut down the Hummer, Saab, and Saturn brands, slash the number of dealerships, and is in the process of shedding 47,000 jobs globally this year.

Will all the cost-cutting work? Only if and when the economy gets back on track, economists say. There, again, GM is in the same boat with the rest of America. The auto bailout is part of a larger effort by government to revive a credit-strained economy. The stimulus plan President Obama signed Tuesday, and foreclosure prevention plans he outlined Wednesday, are other links in that same chain. Detroit has to hope that those efforts bring consumers back to car lots.