Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Workers put down roots

A rough housing market gives rise to relocation resistance.

By Marilyn GardnerStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / November 3, 2008

jud guitteau


As a resident of Philadelphia for 20 years, Scott Clinton has established deep roots. So when the transport company where he works as a mechanical engineer announced that it will relocate to Greenville, S.C., at the end of the year, he decided not to go.

Skip to next paragraph

"I'm very committed to our church, our family, our friends, our community," Mr. Clinton says. "We're just not interested in picking up and moving." Instead, he is looking for a new job. Most of the firm's 67 workers are doing the same.

In decades past, employees like Clinton were more willing to relocate, either to accept a transfer or to take a job with a different employer. Today greater independence prevails. People are more likely to say no to a move, citing a sluggish real estate market, a spouse's job, or even a divorce settlement that restricts parental moves.

Back in the days of frequent relocations, people joked that IBM was shorthand for "I've Been Moved." Transfers usually meant advancing to the next rung on the corporate ladder. That is still the case for some. But for others, like Clinton, relocating might simply mean doing the same job in a new city.

"No one is saying if you move you'll get a promotion," Clinton says. "My company has decided they want to move to a low-cost-labor part of the country to save money. That doesn't talk to my interests."

Only 13 percent of job seekers finding positions in the third quarter of 2008 moved for their new job, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. That is down from 15 percent in 2007 and 16 percent in 2006.

"We are seeing a lot of moves that are delayed or canceled because of the financial concerns people have," says Joseph Benevides, senior vice president of Paragon Global Resources, a relocation service. "The big impediment is the price of housing in the home they're leaving. The house is worth less than they paid for it or worth less than they owe. That is the principal reason relocations are being refused, certainly surpassing family."

Relocations are also taking longer. "The time has extended pretty dramatically in the last 12 months or so," Mr. Benevides says. That creates a need for duplicate housing as transferees maintain their existing home while accruing living expenses in a new location. Benevides calls it "a major cost issue."

To spur moves, some employers are offering "loss on sale" protection. If a house sells for less than the purchase price, a company covers the loss.

Sellers are also getting help in marketing their homes. The new real estate mantra is: condition, condition, condition. "There are many more sellers of homes than buyers," Benevides explains. "People are going to be looking for a home in the best condition."

For recent college graduates without mortgages and children, the picture is different. Eighty-five percent would relocate for a job, according to a survey by Experience Inc. Seventy percent would consider moving abroad. Even so, a third say a high cost of living could be a factor in turning down a stellar job opportunity.