My 'Updike year' – why I appreciate the man more now than ever

Updike's works accompanied me to the doctor and the dentist, to campouts and picnics, summer vacations and office lunch hours.

This reader's favorite memory of Updike is not a particular subject or turn of phrase but rather the heroic moderation of the man – his quiet insistence on teasing out an insight with subtlety and grace, never raising his voice.

Seven years ago this week, John Updike died at age 76, concluding one of the most prolific careers in American letters. News of his death grieved me, but it prompted a new possibility. Maybe with no more new Updike stuff coming out, or so I remember thinking to myself, I could finally begin to catch up on all the works in his backlist that had eluded me.

That passing thought, revisited a long while later, evolved into my New Year’s resolution for last year, announced in a Jan. 1, 2015 post for “Chapter & Verse.” Over the next 12 months, or so I planned back then, I’d try to read as many of John Updike’s books “as I can.”

Notice that modest pledge to simply do my best, without any audacious claim that I’d make my way through all of Updike’s published works. Although best known for his “Rabbit,” novels, which chronicled life in affluent suburbia, Updike turned out 60 books in all, including poetry, a memoir, personal essays, literary criticism, and articles about his abiding avocation, visual art. To get all the way through Updike in a year, I’d have to finish more than a book a week, an ambitious project for any bibliophile.  I’m a slow reader who’s also obliged, as a professional reviewer and journalist, to tackle a lot of other books throughout the year.   

All of which is my way of saying that in 2015, I managed to read only a fraction of the Updike canon, poking around mostly in the personal essays and criticism collected in a half a dozen volumes, including “Odd Jobs,” “Hugging the Shore”  and “Picked-up Pieces.”

These thick works, recently reprinted in handsome editions by Random House, accompanied me to the doctor and the dentist, to campouts and picnics, summer vacations and office lunch hours. And Updike was waiting for me on the nightstand each evening, too – a daily companion through four seasons of my middle-aged life.

What I remember most vividly from my year of Updike isn’t a particular subject or turn of phrase; he wrote about everything from baseball to cemeteries to the postal service with precision, wit, and a mastery of language that defies easy summary. No, the most abiding memory of my Updike year is the heroic moderation of the man – his quiet insistence on teasing out an insight with subtlety and grace, never raising his voice. As the late Christopher Hitchens once pointed out, it wasn’t an accident that Updike named one of his essay collections “Due Considerations.” The title hints at his sensibility, which was perceptive but not biting, appreciative but not cloying, contemplative but not carried away.

That voice continues to be a tonic for me as I negotiate the noise of the headlines, the extremism of the political culture, the venom-tinged pronouncements of the Twittersphere. Updike’s been gone for seven years now, but his work endures, and we need it now more than ever.

Danny Heitman, a columnist for The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana, is the author of “A Summer of Birds: John James Audubon at Oakley House.”            

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to My 'Updike year' – why I appreciate the man more now than ever
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2016/0126/My-Updike-year-why-I-appreciate-the-man-more-now-than-ever
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe