Generosity united the South in the aftermath of 2011 superstorm

‘What Stands in a Storm’ tells one woman's story in the face of the 2011 tornado that tore through Alabama and how social media allowed Southerners to rally and support one another.

'People looked for miracles and found them, and that gave people a lot of strength to get through it,' Cross says of the 2011 tornado that trapped her in her home in Birmingham, Ala.

Tweets, text messages and Facebook posts are more than just addictive and pesky mainstays of modern life. When disaster struck the South in the spring of 2011, technology revealed its power to unite a region in grief and generosity.

Nobody understands this better than journalist Kim Cross, author of the riveting new book What Stands in a Storm: Three Days in the Worst Superstorm to Hit the South's Tornado Alley.

When a tornado tore toward her Birmingham, Ala., home, she huddled in a laundry room with her family and her smartphone, furiously searching for updates. Cross, then working for Southern Living magazine, soon found herself reconstructing a devastating tornado outbreak that left 245 dead in Alabama alone. She’d uncover the remarkable power of tweets and texts to bring people together and keep them safe – before, during and after the storm.

That’s not all. With deep sensitivity, Cross powerfully profiles the TV weathermen who try to warn the public despite ever-present false alarms, the scientists furiously working to better predict tornadoes, and the grieving residents trying to fend off despair through community and faith.

“People looked for miracles and found them, and that gave people a lot of strength to get through it,” Cross says in an interview with the Monitor. “Beautiful things come from brokenness. The things that tear our world apart can bring us together.”
 
Q: Readers from elsewhere may be surprised to learn that the Deep South – “Dixie Alley” – is a hot spot for tornadoes. How does that region compare to the Midwest and Tornado Alley?
 
The Midwest has a greater number of tornadoes, but the South has more big ones. When spring rolls around, it’s part of living here, something that everyone eventually gets used to. It’s sort of like earthquakes in California: You know they happen, but you don’t think about it every day.

I grew up in both California and Alabama, and I remember having to do very much the same thing in school. In California, you have an earthquake drill where you get under your desk. In Alabama, you get in the hallway, tuck into a ball and cover your head with your fingers.
 
Q: What are some differences between tornadoes in the Tornado Alley and the South’s Dixie Alley?

It’s a lot safer to chase tornadoes out there in the Midwest because roads are in a grid pattern. In the South, particularly in Alabama, the roads are winding. Birmingham and Northern Alabama are in the foothills of the Appalachians, and the roads spaghetti all over the place. You rarely see the horizon, and it makes it very dangerous to chase tornadoes because you can’t assume that the road you’re taking will get you out of the way.  Also, here tornadoes tend to be rain-wrapped: The funnel can actually be hidden behind a curtain of rain.
 
 Q: What is the state of tornado forecasting?
 
Forecasters can detect conditions when tornadoes form, but that doesn’t necessarily confirm a tornado. The only way to confirm a tornado is for someone to lay eyes on it.

The huge dilemma of forecasters is that they can see a signature of what looks like a tornado, but it may or not be, and they have to make a call about whether they want to warn about it. If they do issue a warning, it could a false alarm and increase people’s complacency. But if they don’t warn about it, people die.

Since the 2011 superstorm, they’re using  more dual-polarization radar, which allows you to not only detect the presence of some kind of matter in the air, whether it’s bugs or precipitation, but actually see an indication of the shape of it. A meteorologist can look at a radar screen and say “that’s rain” or “that’s debris” with a greater degree of confidence.
 
Q: What happened when the tornado came near your home?
 
We were hearing about storms a week ahead of time, and we knew they’d be bad. I remember seeing the first tornado of the day on live camera, and then we watched as the big one headed toward Tuscaloosa.

I was sitting with my husband and my son, who was then 3 or 4, thinking, “Oh gosh, this doesn’t feel real. People are dying right now.” You feel like you’re watching a movie, and someone’s playing a trick on you.

We’re watching it with great trepidation, then sirens start wailing and the power turns off. There’s this horrible silence when all the sounds you’re used to grind to a halt. We went into our safe room, a laundry room at the center of the house with no windows and away from doors. I remember getting my phone out, and at some point the forecaster called out my neighborhood. It got really scary. The tornado came about 7-10 miles away.
 
Q: What struck you about how people reacted to the tornados?
 
I was impressed by the speed at which people started rescuing each other. The authorities did a great job, but people didn’t wait. They just started digging for each other and helped strangers. In the immediate aftermath and the recovery, I found that really touching.
 
 Q: How did social media change how people reacted to the tornados?
 
You have many more sources of information. You can watch TV on your phone, you can follow tweets of people, and alert your friends and family. After the storm, the phone lines might be down or overloaded, but a text can get through when a phone call can’t.

Facebook and Twitter became mechanisms of spreading word about relief needs and supplies. It really changes the way people give. Before, if you wanted to help, you’d write a check and send it to the Red Cross. Now, someone can say “We need diapers in Alberta City,” and you could see that and respond to it and say, “I’m on the way.” You could meet the person who needed it face to face.

That was a point of healing for both sides. You want to help, and it feels better to know you can help this young mother and hug her instead of giving money to a faceless organization. That made it deeply personal.
 
 Q: Did any part of the reaction seem quintessentially Southern?
 
The parking lots would fill with giant grills towed behind trucks and different church groups, people of different denominations and religions working side to side. The Methodists might do the prep, the Baptists the grilling, and another denomination handles delivery.

Sometimes you think, “there’s nothing I can do to make things better, but I can make a casserole.” A woman in a little Mississippi town called Smithville that got devastated by a category F5 tornado rallied her friends, saying “I need cakes.” Sixteen cakes came to her house, and they were just holding a sign that said “Free Food.”

They kept trying to feed us. We kept telling them we’re not victims, we don’t deserve their food. But it made them feel good, and they wouldn’t let you leave without at least an ice-cold Coke.
 
 Q: What was it like for you personally to write the book?
 
You feel squeamish and horrible asking people who’ve lost a child to relive the worst day of their life. But I was surprised at the healing that came through the stories both for the families and for readers.
 
 Randy Dotinga, a Monitor contributor, is president of the American Society of Journalists and Authors.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Generosity united the South in the aftermath of 2011 superstorm
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2015/0806/Generosity-united-the-South-in-the-aftermath-of-2011-superstorm
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe