Book world expresses disappointment, outrage over Pulitzer snub
Pulitzer juror Susan Larson said she and the rest of the fiction jury are 'shocked … angry … and very disappointed' that the Pulitzer board elected not to choose a 2012 fiction winner.
Some members of the book community were outraged when the announcement was made that there would not be a Pulitzer Prize awarded for fiction this year, the first time in 35 years that such an event had occurred and the eleventh time in the prize’s history.Skip to next paragraph
Molly Driscoll is a Books and the Culture staff writer.
Pastor reportedly buys his way onto New York Times bestseller list
'Paddington' movie trailer glimpses at children's book series bear
Goldman Sachs elevator tweeter loses book deal
Characters struggle for sleep in new literary works
Anne Rice and others sign petition urging Amazon to get rid of anonymous comments
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
For the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, a fiction jury chose three candidates and submitted them to the Pulitzer Prize board, selecting “Swamplandia!” by Karen Russell, “The Pale King” by David Foster Wallace and “Train Dreams” by Denis Johnson. Per awards procedure, it was the Pulitzer Prize board members who then decided that none of the three finalists would receive the award.
One of the three jurors who chose the three finalists has publicly expressed their displeasure with the Pulitzer committee’s decision.
“This was a lot of work,” she said. “I think we all would have been happy if any of [the three] books had been selected.”
She and the other two jurors, previous Pulitzer winner for fiction Michael Cunningham and NPR “Fresh Air” host Maureen Corrigan, don’t know why the Pulitzer committee did not select a winner, said Larson.
“Whenever they make a decision, it’s not meant to be a statement about fiction in general,” Gissler told the New York Times. “It’s just a statement that none was able to receive a majority.”
Paul Bogaards, director of publicity at “Swamplandia!” publisher Alfred A. Knopf, said the lack of a winner was a disappointment partly because of the sales numbers a win can bring.
“It's the most significant award in American letters and it's a shame the jury couldn't find a work of fiction this year,” Bogaards told the AP. “The Pulitzer makes sales. It's a prize that can change the career trajectory of a writer.”