Beyond "Harry Potter": 5 interesting tales of plagiarism
J.K. Rowling is only one of many well-known authors to face charges of plagiarism.
Last week, "Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling was named as a defendant in a lawsuit in a London court. It's not the first time that Rowling has faced such charges. This time, the estate of author Adrian Jacobs claims that key concepts appearing in her book "Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire" were lifted from Jacobs's 1987 book "The Adventures of Willy the Wizard." Rowling calls the charges absurd; the Jacobs estate, instead, says the suit is "a billion-dollar case."Skip to next paragraph
End to an era at legendary Paris bookshop Shakespeare and Company
'Daughter of Smoke and Bone' film rights acquired by Universal
Better World Books' bestseller list: more classics than new titles
More books, more choices: why America needs its indies
Is Slate's Amazon-defending blogger really a 'moron'?
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Rowling is hardly the first well-known writer to face plagiarism charges. The results of such charges tend to vary widely. Some end up dismissed as without merit, others ruin careers, and yet others seem simply to disappear.
Here are five of the more high-profile cases to spring up in recent years:
– Charges that Dan Brown largely copied "The Da Vinci Code" from an earlier novel. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, two of the three authors of the 1987 "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail," charged that Brown stole some basic elements of the plot of their book for his 2003 blockbuster "The Da Vinci Code". Baigent and Leigh lost their 2006 case against Random House – Brown's publisher – in a London court and then were defeated again on appeal. The two were also forced to pay the bulk of Random House's legal costs. The trial did, however, put "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail" on bestseller lists.
– A debate over the relationship between Ian McEwan's "Atonement" and an earlier memoir. In 2001 Ian McEwan's highly acclaimed novel "Atonement" was published. A few years later, the British press noted close similarities between details in "Atonement" and a 1977 memoir by Lucilla Andrews called "No Time for Romance." McEwan replied that he had indeed been inspired by Andrews' memories and pointed out that he had even mentioned Andrews and her writing in the author’s note at the end of "Atonement." (Andrews had died a few months before the controversy erupted.) The debate ultimately came down to a question as to whether McEwan had sufficiently acknowledged his debt to Andrews.