- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- As Sarkozy seeks new term, French are wary of 'Merkozy' (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
"Conversations with God" author charged with plagiarism
Neale Donald Walsch, author of the "Conversations with God" series, admitted yesterday in his blog on the Beliefnet website that a Christmas essay he had passed off as his own was actually written by someone else.
Skip to next paragraphRecent posts
-
02.14.12
Valentine's Day: Getting past Muslim romance stereotypes -
02.13.12
Railroad historian says California is on wrong track -
02.10.12
Eudora Welty: the garden at the heart of her creativity -
02.09.12
Nancy Pearl: caught in the anti-Amazon backlash -
02.09.12
A new series for 'Series of Unfortunate Events' author Lemony Snicket
Walsch had written a story about what he said was a Christmas concert at his son's school 20 years ago. In the story, the children held up letters that were meant to spell out the words, "Christmas Love." But one child held the letter "m" upside down, so the message read "Christ was Love" instead.
It turns out the story was originally written – in nearly identical form – by a writer named Candy Chand, who published it 10 years ago in Clarity, a spiritual magazine. It has been circulating on the internet ever since.
Walsch's blog has been taken off the Beliefnet site. But yesterday he wrote an apology to readers and said he must have unknowingly internalized the story.
“All I can say now — because I am truly mystified and taken aback by this — is that someone must have sent it to me over the Internet ten years or so ago,” he wrote. “Finding it utterly charming and its message indelible, I must have clipped and pasted it into my file of ‘stories to tell that have a message I want to share.’ I have told the story verbally so many times over the years that I had it memorized ... and then, somewhere along the way, internalized it as my own experience.”
Chand, however, is not convinced. “Quite frankly, I’m not buying it,” she told the New York Times.







These comments are not screened before publication. Constructive debate about the above story is welcome, but personal attacks are not. Please do not post comments that are commercial in nature or that violate any copyright[s]. Comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence will be removed. If you find a comment offensive, you may flag it.