The Daring Ladies of Lowell

In her new novel, 'The Dressmaker' author Kate Alcott explores the ramifications of the murder of a Lowell mill girl.

The Daring Ladies of Lowell, by Kate Alcott, Knopf Doubleday, 304 pp.

Laboring for 13 hours a day in dangerous working conditions doesn’t sound like freedom today  – it sounds like a lawsuit. But in 1830s Massachusetts, factory jobs offered young women something they’d almost never had access to before: financial independence.

The Daring Ladies of Lowell steps inside the factory floor of one of the cotton mills. “The Dressmaker,” the story of a seamstress who survived the sinking of the Titanic, was the first novel attributed to Kate Alcott, the pen name of Patricia O’Brien. O’Brien had previously written five novels, including “Harriet and Isabella,” about “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” author Harriet Beecher Stowe and her estranged sister, Isabella Beecher Hooker.

As with both of those novels, Alcott uses a real-life event as her starting point – in this case, the murder of a mill girl whose case shocked the town.

Rather than marry a man she doesn’t love, Alice Barrow comes to Lowell in 1832 to help her father pay off a debt. (He isn't exactly grateful.) There, she discovers the camaraderie of the dormitories, the joy of buying a hat with her own money, and the intellectual possibilities of the New England town. The monthly periodical, The Lowell Offering, will publish the women’s poetry, stories, and essays under their own names and the Lyceum brings lecturers, including President Andrew Jackson, from all over the US to speak.

Alice also learns the risks: The female workers, all of whom have to be young and unmarried, must keep their hair tied up or risk having it caught in the machinery – which could drag them to their deaths. The cotton fibers clog the air workers’ breath – causing them to cough up cotton balls and eventually shredding their lungs – but opening a window is a firing offense. And going to the doctor is dangerous if you want to keep your job.

“You know they don’t want sick girls here; it makes them look bad,” Sarah’s best friend, Lovey, tells her. "We’re supposed to be the young, healthy workers of modern industry, remember?”

After the thrill of her first paycheck wears off, Alice realizes that working conditions are getting worse, not better, and that, despite the grueling work, the women are being paid less than the men.

“They don’t take us seriously. All we are to anybody are ‘the mill girls’ and I think that should change. Why can’t we be daring ladies?” Lovey asks as she works on a bill of rights she calls “A Mill Girl Manifesto.” An eight-hour work day and equal pay for equal work are two of her more radical ideas. But before Lovey can finish, her body is found hanging on a nearby farm.

At first, her death is dismissed as a suicide, but several clues make Alice and the other girls determined to get justice for Lovey. Alice enlists the help of the mill owner’s son, Samuel Fiske. (It doesn’t hurt that the owners are afraid their source of cheap labor will dry up if they can’t protect their workers.)

Alcott includes a romance, which serves the plot in terms of getting Alice a wider hearing than a “mill girl” presumably otherwise would have had, but it mostly feels tacked on. But when the novel stays focused on its “daring ladies,” it’s a compelling read.

Francis Cabot Lowell may have brought back the blueprints of a new industry from England in his prodigious memory, but it was the mill girls who helped power the Industrial Revolution. It’s good to see them get a book of their own.

Yvonne Zipp is the Monitor fiction critic.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The Daring Ladies of Lowell
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2014/0224/The-Daring-Ladies-of-Lowell
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe