8 college and high school football books to kick off the 2015 season

This fall offers a diverse lineup of new football books.

6. ‘Stagg vs. Yost: The Birth of Cutthroat Football,’ by John Kryk

Anybody who assumes that friendly rivalries characterized college football in the early 1900s only has to read “Stagg vs. Yost” to revise their perceptions. John Kryk paints the period as one in which corruption, under-the-table payments, and overzealous boosters were beginning to sully the sport’s image. The author zeroes in on the fierce competitiveness between two legendary coaches of the day, Michigan’s Fielding H. Yost and the University of Chicago’s Amos Alonzo Stagg, as a case study in how two prominent coaches pushed the boundaries. Stagg was obsessed with toppling the powerhouse Wolverines to the point that he was willing to hedge on the principles he publicly proclaimed. Access to newly available correspondence helps to authenticate the intensity of the rivalry.

Here’s an excerpt from Stagg vs. Yost:

“Fielding Harris ‘Hurry Up’ Yost never had a bowl game named after him, like Amos Alonzo Stagg; or a Hollywood feature film made about him, like Knute Rockne; or an iconic trophy named in his honor, like John Heisman; or a national youth football league named for him, like Pop Warner. Even when the Big Ten Conference in 2010 announced a slew of new trophies and awards to pay homage to its most iconic figures, Yost – the coach with by far the best football winning percentage in league history – was snubbed.

“Although lasting national fame escaped him, few American football coaches have ever understood the game as well as Yost or been as successful at it. At the University of Michigan in the first quarter of the twentieth century, and at four brief stops before that, he won 83 percent of his games – 198 victories against only 35 losses and 12 ties. That’s the best success rate of any coach who has lasted more than twenty-five years in the profession, college or pro, and that includes the likes of Stagg, Warner, Heisman, Joe Paterno, Bobby Bowden, Eddie Robinson, Bear Bryant, Bernie Bierman, Woody Hayes, Lou Holtz, and Bo Schembechler.”

6 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.