8 college and high school football books to kick off the 2015 season

This fall offers a diverse lineup of new football books.

5. ‘Lines of Scrimmage: A Story of Football, Race, and Redemption,’ by Joe Oestreich and Scott Pleasant

Here’s a true story that touches on many of the issues that still challenge some Southern communities. The book centers on a season-long boycott of 31 black players at Conway High in Conway, S.C. The walkout occurred in 1989 after an unseasoned white quarterback was given the nod over the returning black starter, this despite the fact that Carlos Hunt looked to make the town’s beloved Tigers a contender for the school’s first state championship. The black players, with the support of a local pastor and NAACP president, protested Hunt’s demotion as an act of racisim. The impact on Conway of this dispute makes for a revealing study of how hard it can be to move on from cultural tensions. 

Here’s an excerpt from Lines of Scrimmage:

“Twenty-five years later, the boycott remains a subject that people in Conway often speak about in whispers. Local whites get especially tongue-tied when the subject of 1989 comes up, presumably because they don’t want to risk sounding racist. They’ll often tell you that they weren’t supporting a white kid over a black kid; they were supporting the coach’s prerogative to choose who plays where. H.H. Singleton, they’ll say, thought he was doing the right thing, but he should have stuck with leading Cherry Hills Baptist and the NAACP instead of trying to run the football team. Similarly, there are blacks in Conway who still don’t much like Chuck Jordan. They won’t come right out and say he was a racist, but they will say that he didn’t treat Carlos fairly, that he didn’t give the kid a chance.

“Lots of people, black and white, mostly just don’t want to stir up all that trouble again. Let it die, they’ll say. The past is the past. But as long as there are folks in town who still remember that year – and Conwayites tend to stay close to home long after high school graduation – stories of the boycott will endure.”

5 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.