12 sports books make a summer reading potluck

These 12 books range from the story of a family of baseball catchers to a tribute to the knuckleball to an introspective exploration by a woman rower and beyond. Together they offer a summer full of good reading.

12. ‘Cheated: The UNC Scandal, the Education of Athletes, and the Future of Big-Time College Sports,’ by Jay M. Smith and Mary Willingham

Probably no college athletic scandal has ever been reported in as much detail as Jay M. Smith and Mary Willingham have done in “Cheated,” which exposes the extensive dirty academic laundry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill campus. Willingham, who worked for the center that provides tutoring and counseling to student-athletes, was the central whistleblower about the academic fraud, including the sham courses that  kept woefully unprepared football and basketball players academically eligible. With her co-author and UNC history professor, they expose not only the shenanigans but the university’s efforts at damage control.

Here’s an excerpt from Cheated:

“To understand why athletic officials and lawyers would presume to characterize UNC’s academic culture without bothering to invite a faculty member to the discussion, we need only recognize the three things they did not want faculty to know and that they could not afford to acknowledge in the presence of the NCAA: UNC routinely admits athletes who are not up to the challenge of meeting UNC’s academic demands; a large ‘support’ infrastructure has been put in place to disguise, defer, and mitigate the many academic problems that ensue from the admission of these athletes; and the university understands that the athletes themselves cannot really be blamed for the academic corner cutting to which they are inevitably reduced. To save the athletes now on trial, they had to continue their stagecraft – but only in the presence of reliable cast members with much practice in rehearsing the script.”

12 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.