Cormac McCarthy, copy editor extraordinaire

Cormac McCarthy, author of 'No Country for Old Men' and 'The Road,' has copy-edited a biography of a quantum physicist.

Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Cormac McCarthy volunteered to serve as copy editor for Lawrence Krauss's biography "Quantum Man: Richard Feynman's Life in Science" simply because “he loved the book so much that he wanted to make [it] better.”

In a letter to Bertha Krantz, his longtime copy editor at Random House, Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Cormac McCarthy wrote: “Thanks for your corrections. I hope you understand that they are always welcome. Copy editors are becoming about as rare as any other form of literate life and my offer still stands to have you to read the next book – and/or any future books. I'll talk to you soon. Much love – Cormac.” The letter, written in 1992 upon the publication of "All the Pretty Horses," clearly expresses the author’s esteem for talented copy editors like Krantz (who also worked on Ayn Rand’s behemoth "Atlas Shrugged"), but who could have foreseen that the author himself would join their ranks some 20 years later?

A recent article in the Chronicle of Higher Education publicized Cormac McCarthy’s role as copy editor of the paperback edition of "Quantum Man: Richard Feynman's Life in Science" by Lawrence Krauss, to be released next month by W.W. Norton. Krauss, a theoretical physicist and director of the Origins Initiative at Arizona State University, told the Chronicle that McCarthy, whom he has known for about four years, had voluntarily offered his services because “he loved the book so much that he wanted to make [it] better.” He added, “Having Cormac’s name on the paperback is one of the biggest honors I could imagine."

Integral to the process of revision was the excision of “all exclamation points and semicolons, both of which he said have no place in literature. [McCarthy] went through the book in detail and made suggestions for rephrasing in certain points as well.” (The physicist Richard Feynman himself was, ironically, no foe of exclamation marks, as evinced by the title of his popular autobiography, "Surely You're Joking, Mr Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character as Told to Ralph Leighton.")

Despite his denunciation of exclamation points and semicolons, McCarthy has been guilty of using them in some of his own works, so is it fair to accuse him of hypocrisy? Those eager to defend the famously reclusive author from such a charge might say that the vendetta against certain forms of punctuation reflects a shift in the author’s attitude rather than a long-entrenched view. Yet, his letter to Krantz suggests that even in moments of deepest gratitude, McCarthy was not one to make heartfelt effusions or to give overt indications of his feelings; there is not a single exclamation point (or semicolon) in the laconic note that recalls the sparse lyricism of his prose.

McCarthy’s involvement with Krauss’s book does not represent his first venture into copy-editing. In 2005, he undertook the polishing of Harvard physicist Lisa Randall’s "Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions." Randall, praising his skills, told the Radcliffe Quarterly, “He really smoothed the prose.” She elaborated to The New York Times Arts blog, “Cormac isolated all the semicolons in the margin; I then removed them. Apparently exclamation points are only for exclamations! Those were removed too."

According to a recent article on the Daily Beast, since the 1990s, McCarthy has formed part of the group of intellectuals at the Santa Fe Institute, an independent research center founded by the Nobel Prize-winning physicist and discoverer of the quark Murray Gell-Mann. When he’s not busy pounding away on his typewriter (he claims to have written a few books at the Institute), McCarthy contributes to scientific discussions and impresses his colleagues by asking questions that reveal his “knowledge of math and physics, and in particular the histories of those fields [to] exceed that of many professional physicists and mathematicians.”

McCarthy articulated his abiding interest (love is perhaps too strong a word) for science and stimulating conversation: “I’m not here because I’m a novelist,” he said. “I just managed to sneak in. I haven’t read a novel in years. I’m here because I like science, and this is a fun place to spend time. There’s good craic."

Rhoda Feng is a Monitor contributor.

Join the Monitor's book discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Cormac McCarthy, copy editor extraordinaire
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/2012/0223/Cormac-McCarthy-copy-editor-extraordinaire
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe