Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Fighting with Taliban flares in the west, and east, of Afghanistan

The clashes, described as the worst since 2001, have intensified concerns about a resurgent Taliban.

(Page 2 of 2)



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

The British Broadcasting Corp. reports heavy casualties in the Kandahar fighting.

Skip to next paragraph

Fifty Taleban have been killed, according to Afghan police, and 40 injured, although those figures are impossible to confirm independently. The police also said one Afghan soldier and three police officers were killed.

Correspondents say that fighting in Afghanistan is the heaviest since the fall of the Taleban six years ago, and civilians are increasingly among the casualties.

On Monday Nato denied claims by an official in the province of Wardak that 13 Afghan civilians were killed in a Nato air strike near Kabul.

In an opinion piece in the International Herald Tribune Roger Cohen recounts a recent trip to Afghanistan, which convinced him that the US will need to make a long-term military commitment to the country if stability is to be achieved.

I heard many assessments of how long Afghanistan will depend on Western military assistance, but Abdul Jabar Sabet, the attorney general, was bluntest: "The Afghan army will not be able to defend the country for 10 years, so the international force has to be here for at least a decade."

The next U.S. president will face an enduring challenge in Afghanistan of immense proportions. He or she will need to level with the American people, in a way President George W. Bush never has, about the real burden of an attempt to build two countries from the ground up at once.

One reason Afghanistan is so challenging is that while it's a desperately poor country, the country's booming opium and heroin trade provides ready funds for insurgents. The United Nations said Wednesday that most of the profits from the drug trade go to terrorists and criminals, and calls Afghan opium exports a "tsunami."

Afghanistan had a record harvest of 8,200 tons of opium in 2007, a 34% increase in production over 2006. The total opium export is valued at $4 billion in Afghanistan, an increase of 29% over 2006. The opium economy is now equivalent to more than half (53%) of the country's licit gross domestic product.

This deadly export gains value at every border crossing, because of the risks associated with smuggling. By the time the heroin hits the streets of Moscow, London or Paris, the Afghan opium export could be worth up to 100 times more. For Antonio Maria Costa, executive head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, "while opium brings some revenue to Afghanistan, over 90 per cent of profits are made by international criminal gangs and terrorists networks".

Meanwhile, Japan said its Navy will stop supporting NATO forces in Afghanistan, The Guardian reports.

Japan's government has ordered its navy to end its mission in support of coalition forces in Afghanistan after failing to win opposition backing to renew the deployment before today's midnight deadline ... Opposition parties, which gained control of the upper house of Japan's parliament in July, said the mission did not have a UN mandate and possibly violated the country's pacifist constitution, which severely limits the military's overseas role.

The prime minister, Yasuko Fukuda, today vowed to pass new legislation that would enable Japan to play a smaller, but symbolically important part in the US-led war on terror.

Page: Previous Page 1 | 2

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions