US Supreme Court allows late-term abortion ban

The 5-to-4 ruling upholds a ban on 'partial-birth' abortion. In 2000, the court had struck down a similar ban.

from the April 19, 2007 edition

Page 3 of 3

Page 1 | Page 2 | 3

The high court took up the Nebraska and California cases last fall. In reversing both decisions, the majority justices said that those challenging the law had failed to prove that it was unconstitutionally vague and that it imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to abortion.

The ruling means the law is now enforceable in all 50 states.

Abortion-rights advocates condemned the ruling. "Today's 5-to-4 decision is further proof that the confirmation of right-wing nominees to the Supreme Court has disastrous consequences for American' rights and liberties," said Ralph Neas, president of People for the American Way.

Abortion opponents viewed the ruling as a step forward.

James Bopp, general counsel of the National Right to Life Committee, said the court's decision is important because now the procedure has been banned. "Partial-birth abortion involves killing a child just inches from full delivery," he said. "One of our concerns was the right to abortion moving outside the womb now during delivery and really being an expansion of the right. The court has rejected that."

He adds that the decision will shift the focus of abortion-rights cases away from hypothetical "facial" challenges to concrete cases in which the hardship must be demonstrated and proved. "That is a very welcome development," Mr. Bopp says.

The federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was passed by Congress three years after the US Supreme Court in June 2000 struck down a similar Nebraska law banning so-called partial-birth abortions.

The high court struck the law down in part because it lacked a health exception. The 5-to-4 majority also said it created an undue burden on a woman's right to choose to terminate her pregnancy.

Congress deliberately excluded a health exception from the federal version of the law, knowing that the measure would work its way through the courts and back to the US Supreme Court. By the time it did, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the key fifth vote in the 2000 Nebraska case, had retired and left the court. She was replaced by Justice Alito, whose vote proved decisive on Wednesday.

– Staff writer Linda Feldmann contributed to this article.

1 | 2 | Page 3