In response to the Feb. 15 article, "Can US auto giants cut their way to health?": American carmakers are facing a problem of their own making. Aren't they the masters of marketing – of telling people what they "need" and "want"? "You need and want an SUV," the ads implored. People believed them and bought them up.
What if the message had been, "You need a small, safe, well-built, economical car?" Given the power of persuasion, I suspect that people would have believed the message and bought up smaller, more efficient cars. And the US carmakers' story would have been very different today.
Is it fair to suggest that these carmakers have been irresponsible to their shareholders, employees, clients, and society in general by pushing SUVs and other such products?
In response to the article about American car companies such as Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors: In 1967, my father bought a beautiful red Plymouth Barracuda. Soon, we found out that it had electrical problems that no mechanic could solve.
In 1999, he bought a Chrysler Concorde, and it has the same problem. As I write this, I have the car in the shop because the brake pads are worn. And the car has less than 35,000 miles on it. As long as Chrysler ignores its customers' needs for reliability, they will continue to lose sales.
Regarding the Feb. 15 article, "Can Romney rise to top of GOP presidential pack?": I am dismayed regarding the erroneous ideas and biases that folks express regarding Mormons. I lived in America's intermountain West for several years and experienced on a daily basis the integrity, care, generosity, and support of my Mormon neighbors, bosses, friends, and acquaintances.
I received my master's degree from Brigham Young University and feel blessed to have been a part of that institution. I always note with pride when I'm traveling in Africa that Latter-day Saint Charities help everyone, even projects headed up by Evangelicals. (By the way, I am a Democrat, was reared as a Southern Baptist, am married to a Catholic, and, of course, have the highest regard for Mormons.)
Regarding the article, "Flying the cleanly skies," from Feb. 12: Having grown up in the 1930s and 1940s, I am still amazed at how many people today fly so far and so often, barely appreciating what exists closer to home. Our politicians set the worst examples, polluting the skies for meetings that could best be served by conference calls.
Helen N. Hanna
Regarding the Jan. 31 article, "Wolf dogs find haven in New Hampshire sanctuary": My wife and I are animal lovers. We have 56 acres here in central Pennsylvania. We feed the deer and hire armed guards during deer season to keep hunters off our property. When we lived in South Carolina, we had friends who raised wolf dogs. I was unaware of the potential for problems in keeping wolf dogs as pets. I can put myself in the shoes of the wolf dogs' benefactor, who runs the New Hampshire sanctuary. He is to be admired.
Schuylkill Haven, Pa.
The Monitor welcomes your letters and opinion articles. Because of the volume of mail we receive, we can neither acknowledge nor return unpublished submissions. All submissions are subject to editing. Letters must be signed and include your mailing address and telephone number. Any letter accepted will appear in print and on our website, www.csmonitor.com.
Mail letters to 'Readers Write,' and opinion articles to Opinion Page, One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115, or fax to (617) 450-2317, or e-mail to Letters.