Israeli right may gain ground

There is a new player in Israel's parliamentary election campaign - and its name is Hamas.

While the Islamic militant group's election landslide last week will overhaul Palestinian politics, the shock of a new Hamas-led government may also alter the landscape of a parliamentary vote in Israel this March.

Hamas's ascendancy is liable to cast the unilateral pullbacks supported by Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and by a majority of the Israeli public in a more troubling light. Meanwhile, the shock of a new Palestinian government run by a group formally committed to Israel's destruction has offered the Israeli right and Likud party chairman Benjamin Netanyahu new ammunition to stage an electoral comeback.

"We are in a struggle against Hamastan,'' said Mr. Netanyahu in an interview with Israel Radio Sunday, using a nickname he has repeated frequently over the weekend.

"Facing an organization of this sort, we need to switch diskettes. The concept of folding in the face of terror is what lifted Hamas," he said. "The last thing that we should be doing is to giving them more withdrawals for free.''

The lead of Mr. Olmert's Kadima party in public opinion polls reflects broad approval of the September withdrawal from the Gaza Strip led by Ariel Sharon, who has been in a coma since suffering a stroke earlier this month.

Some observers have suggested that the Hamas victory could actually help Kadima by convincing Israelis that there is no Palestinian interlocutor for negotiations, and that the unilateral withdrawals of Mr. Sharon are the only means of determining a border with the Palestinians.

But with Hamas at the helm, new withdrawals in the West Bank will be a tougher sell. The Gaza pullback was easier to accept because the withdrawal was ultimately coordinated with a moderate Palestinian administration dominated by President Mahmoud Abbas.

Future pullbacks would leave a power vacuum that could be filled by Islamic militants, stirring memories of Israel's abandonment of southern Lebanon to the guerrillas of the Iranian-backed Hizbullah.

"The main question now is whether unilateral withdrawal, which was the presumed favorite option of Kadima, is still viable,'' says Yossi Klein Halevi, a fellow at the Shalem Center, a Jerusalem-based research institute. "That's because we're not talking about handing over territory to a corrupt, anarchic, terror-supporting Fatah, but to an Iranian proxy that's far more dangerous.''

In the days following the election, Hamas leaders in both Gaza and Damascus, Syria, reiterated the organization's stance against recognizing Israel or disarming the military wing responsible for years of suicide bombings targeting Israelis.

The prospect of Hamas-led government is likely to be used by Likud in the election in much the same way it invoked former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in the party's campaigns to drive home the need for a strong uncompromising leader.

Page: 1 | 2