csmonitor.com - The Christian Science Monitor Online
 
Arts & Entertainment>Movies:
from the November 10, 2005 edition

Updating 'Pride' for 2005

| Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor
When Joe Wright set out to film the umpteenth screen adaptation of Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," his goal was simple: "Make it youthful and fresh and not so stiff." The Monitor sat down to chat with Wright about the movie during a recent press tour.

Get all the Monitor's headlines by e-mail.
Subscribe for free.
E-mail this story
Write a letter to the Editor
Printer-friendly version
Permission to reprint/republish

Whose idea was it to turn "Pride and Prejudice" into a film again?

It was Working Title's idea - the production company. They realized that "Pride and Prejudice" hadn't been made as a film since 1940. A lot of their films have kind of been based on "Pride and Prejudice" - "Bridget Jones's Diary" and such.

What was your reaction when you were approached to direct the film?

I thought that "Pride & Prejudice" and Jane Austen was really for girls, and I thought that I was a bit more cool than that. I took the script to the pub one Sunday afternoon, and as I read it, I found myself weeping.... I found it very moving, and I was laughing out loud as well. And so that quite surprised me, so I went and read the novel and was shocked to find the novel as fresh and as lively as it is.... I cast away my prejudices and dived in.

What kind of an actress were you looking for when you cast the role of the heroine, Elizabeth Bennet?

I wasn't initially looking for someone as beautiful as Keira [Knightley]. I thought that Elizabeth Bennet should be slightly plainer ... you know, Darcy's attracted to her for the liveliness of her mind, rather than her physical attributes. But when I met Keira, I discovered her to be an extraordinary scruffy tomboy who didn't say what she thought you wanted to hear, said exactly what she believed, and has a wonderful lightness of humor. [She has] an incredible independence of spirit and a very quick wit. All of those qualities to me summed up the spirit of Elizabeth Bennet, so that's why I cast her.

This film is set in 1797. Do you think it's difficult for today's modern audience to identify with the film?

I don't think it is difficult to identify with the film because what one's dealing with are fairly elemental emotions, and that's what I find fascinating. And I think that the enduring appeal of the novel is dealing with two characters [who] have preconceived notions of each other and are prideful and resistant to what their hearts are telling them. I think that's as common today as it was in 1797.


Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)

Photos In Pictures
Open road to the finals

ELECTION '08 Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

FISHERIES Empty Oceans Series
The sea is no longer so vast.


Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Discussions with Monitor reporters from around the world


Today

Pat Murphy

Sen. John McCain prepares for his big night




Today's print issue
Today's Issue of The Christian Science Monitor