Arts & Entertainment>Movies:
from the November 10, 2005 edition

Updating 'Pride' for 2005

| Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor
When Joe Wright set out to film the umpteenth screen adaptation of Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," his goal was simple: "Make it youthful and fresh and not so stiff." The Monitor sat down to chat with Wright about the movie during a recent press tour.

Get all the Monitor's headlines by e-mail.
Subscribe for free.

Whose idea was it to turn "Pride and Prejudice" into a film again?

It was Working Title's idea - the production company. They realized that "Pride and Prejudice" hadn't been made as a film since 1940. A lot of their films have kind of been based on "Pride and Prejudice" - "Bridget Jones's Diary" and such.

What was your reaction when you were approached to direct the film?

I thought that "Pride & Prejudice" and Jane Austen was really for girls, and I thought that I was a bit more cool than that. I took the script to the pub one Sunday afternoon, and as I read it, I found myself weeping.... I found it very moving, and I was laughing out loud as well. And so that quite surprised me, so I went and read the novel and was shocked to find the novel as fresh and as lively as it is.... I cast away my prejudices and dived in.

What kind of an actress were you looking for when you cast the role of the heroine, Elizabeth Bennet?

I wasn't initially looking for someone as beautiful as Keira [Knightley]. I thought that Elizabeth Bennet should be slightly plainer ... you know, Darcy's attracted to her for the liveliness of her mind, rather than her physical attributes. But when I met Keira, I discovered her to be an extraordinary scruffy tomboy who didn't say what she thought you wanted to hear, said exactly what she believed, and has a wonderful lightness of humor. [She has] an incredible independence of spirit and a very quick wit. All of those qualities to me summed up the spirit of Elizabeth Bennet, so that's why I cast her.

This film is set in 1797. Do you think it's difficult for today's modern audience to identify with the film?

I don't think it is difficult to identify with the film because what one's dealing with are fairly elemental emotions, and that's what I find fascinating. And I think that the enduring appeal of the novel is dealing with two characters [who] have preconceived notions of each other and are prideful and resistant to what their hearts are telling them. I think that's as common today as it was in 1797.


Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)

In Pictures
Fireworks: A party in the sky

ELECTION '08 Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

FISHERIES Empty Oceans Series
The sea is no longer so vast.


Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Discussions with Monitor reporters from around the world


Today

Peter Grier

Honduras has two presidents, but no solution to the country's political crisis.




Making a difference
Making a Difference

What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change. See how individuals are making a difference, finding solutions, overcoming adversity, and giving back globally.

Jeremy Gilley, founder of the nonprofit Peace One Day, talks with students at Cambridge Rindge and Latin High School in Cambridge, Mass.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff

People making a difference: Jeremy Gilley

This actor and filmmaker envisions that world peace begins with just one day of peace.