Jonestown docudrama yields no easy answers
(Page 2 of 2)
"Why" is one of the great questions of that day. Shorthand accounts point to brainwashing, but the Berkeley production delves into the complicated choices and circumstances that temple members faced, and raises questions about coercion and free will.
The play is the result of three years of exhaustive research by writer-director Leigh Fondakowski in association with several other writers and an archivist. All the play's dialogue is drawn verbatim from original interviews with dozens of survivors and others associated with the temple, as well as from news stories, letters, diaries, audio recordings, and other historical documents. They also sought to include more African-American voices than previous versions of the story; some 70 percent of those who lived and died in Jonestown were black.
"They really took on a lot," says Janet Shular, a former member portrayed on stage. She recalls telling the writers, "I hope you know you're tiptoeing around quicksand." It was Ms. Shular's first such interview about her experience at Peoples Temple. Several other survivors spoke publicly for the first time with the writers.
Eugene Smith, a former member who lost his wife and child in Jonestown, says he was nervous about relating his story. "You have to keep in mind, here it was 26 years ago, I had never spoken about it, in fact I was very ashamed of it, and felt like it wasn't something that needed to be shared," he says.
Many survivors interviewed came to trust the writing team for their persistence and sensitivity. Survivor Laura Johnston Kohl, who also figures in the play, says that Ms. Fondakowski "graciously listened to our stories and made this magnificent production, which none of us [survivors] could have done, because none of us could have pulled back from our specific points of view to present the whole picture in the way that she has."
Instead of relating the usual sensationalistic story, the writers give voice to a variety of the members of Peoples Temple, their motivations for joining, their lives in the temple, and how the community arrived at its tragic end.
Deftly balancing the informational demands of documentary with the dramatic demands of theater, the play has drawn praise from critics. The San Francisco Chronicle reviewer Rob Hurwitt wrote: "The unique power of theater to explore compelling stories as a communal experience is profoundly and movingly at work in 'The People's Temple.' "
Mr. Smith says "It puts a human face on an incident that never had a human face."
Audiences identify with characters whose actions they may have found incomprehensible. Herein lies a simple but profound achievement of the play, which is to take stock of the humanity of those involved. The losses at Jonestown can never be recouped. But for some survivors at least, the play may ease the stigma of dehumanization they and their loved ones have suffered.
• Paul VanDeCarr is working on a film documentary called "After Jonestown."
Page:
1 | 2




