World>Terrorism & Security
posted January 6, 2004, updated 12:30 p.m.

Army Reserve a 'broken force'?

US Army Reserve chief says 'dysfunctional military policies' hurting reserve.
| csmonitor.com

The US Army Reserve, a force that is being counted on to provide troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, is " degenerating into a 'broken' force," according to Lt. Gen. James Helmly, the Army Reserve's chief. Reuters reports that Lt. Gen Helmly used the above description in a Dec. 20, 2004 memo written to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker, which was made public Wednesday.
"While ability to meet the current demands associated with OIF (Operational Iraqi Freedom) and OEF (Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan) is of great importance, the Army Reserve is additionally in grave danger of being unable to meet other operational requirements including those in named OPLANS (operational plans) and CONUS (continental United States) emergencies, and is rapidly degenerating into a 'broken' force," Helmly wrote.



01/05/05
01/04/05
01/03/04

Sign up to be notified daily:


Find out more.
According to the US Department of Defense website, as of Jan. 5, 2004, there are 162,007 Army National Guard and Army Reserve members currently on active duty in support of the partial mobilization in Iraq and Afghanistan. About 52,000 of those are members of the Army Reserve, with 17,000 currently serving in Iraq. Army Reserve usually provides "military police, civil affairs soldiers, medics, and truck drivers for the wars."

The BBC reports that in his memo, which originally appeared in Wednesday's Baltimore Sun newspaper on Wednesday, Helmly takes issue with what he calls several "dysfunctional" practices of the Department of Defense:

  • Financial incentives to attract and retain reservists on active duty, which the general says confuses "volunteers" with "mercenaries"
  • Reservists being called to active duty at only a few days' notice
  • Reserve troops being required to leave equipment for other forces after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.
CNN reports that while many Army Reserve soldiers understand that being mobilized in times of war is "inherent" in their contract with the Army, Helmly says in the memo that many others have " expressed surprise and indignation at being mobilized for this war."

The result, says Helmly, is that Reserve commanders spend too much time trying to find ways to accommodate soliders who "don't want to serve" in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, "leaving the force unable to meet its mission requirements." He says this is the result of policies that were designed for a reserve force in times of peace rather than war.

Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat from Rhode Island, in response to the news about Helmly's memo, told the Associated Press that "By consistently underestimating the number of troops necessary for the successful occupation of Iraq, the administration has placed a tremendous burden on the Army Reserve and created this crisis."

Richard I. Stark Jr., a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., and a retired Army colonel, writes in the Bangor Daily News that in May 2004, a defense survey found " a significant decline in spousal support for participation in the Reserves among Iraq-vet families." He also noted that the Army National Guard missed its recruiting goals by 12 percent in 2004. Mr. Stark says that if we're going to fix these problems, the chief goal must be to manage expectations.

... to establish predictability in the length and frequency of deployments. This will minimize disruptions to families and employers and allow more effective management of units. We must also ensure that we provide resources and training that are adequate for the missions assigned to them. Finally, personnel compensation and benefits need to be reconciled with the nature of Reserve duty, both to ensure equity and to assure that Reserve service remains competitive and attractive.
The Associated Press reports that Helmly declined Wednesday to discuss his memo. But on Tuesday, he had told the Baltimore Sun that, while he did not intend to sound "alarmist," he did want to send "a clear, distinctive signal of deepening concern."

The Washington Post reports that Col. Joseph Curtin, a senior Army spokesman, said Helmly's concerns are " not new" and that "the Army is moving to resolve them." Col. Curtin said a "task force that is looking at ways to improve benefits for reservists and streamline procedures for activating them."

Also...
Up to 30,000 terrorists in Iraq, intelligence chief says ( Associated Press
US said to seek fewer prisoners in Afghanistan ( Associated Press
Proud families send Reservists to Afghanistan ( Montgomery Advertiser)
Senator asks president to pardon Ohio reservists ( Palm Beach Post)

• Feedback appreciated. E-mail Tom Regan .



Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)
(Mary Knox Merrill/Staff)
EDITOR'S PICK Five cities that will rise in the New Economy
From Seattle to Huntsville, Ala., five cities are poised to prosper in the New Economy because of exports, innovation, clean technology, and healthcare.
POLITICS Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Discussions with Monitor reporters from around the world


Today

Pat Murphy

Kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit could be on his way home.