For US, new hurdles on way to Iraqi vote
A key factor in determining the legitimacy of elections is the participation of the minority Sunni population.
(Page 2 of 2)
Along those lines, Mr. Barkey says Shiite and Kurdish leaders, representing Iraq's two other principal population groups could make a joint statement that in the event that turnout is such in Sunni areas that representation is "less than what it should be," adjustments will be made in the newly elected parliament and the new government "to ensure adequate Sunni representation."
That might sound like backroom bargaining rather than democracy, but Barkey says it could ease sectarian tensions while also "sending a signal to the insurgents that they are not going to win." It would also remind Iraqis that "these elections are not the be-all and end-all" to determine fixed power arrangements but rather just one stop in the process of building a new kind of government.
The Sunni question is part of the larger challenge of sectarian and ethnic polarization, which some experts fear the month-long campaign will only exacerbate.
It isn't clear that Shiite politicians, who suffered under Iraq's Sunni-dominated Baath regime for decades, will listen to calls for special allowances for Sunnis, who have been behind most of the violence. If the Shiites have control of the interim assembly after elections, there will be few immediate incentives for them to make concessions and calls from their constituents to look after group interests over national interests.
Phebe Marr, an Iraq specialist at the US Institute of Peace in Washington, says the elections have "planted a seed" of interest in participation and organization-building, particularly among Iraq's youth. But after a recent trip to Iraq she finds also that "the system is tending towards a Lebanization," mirroring Lebanon's descent in the 1970s into sectarian conflict.
Young Kurds are much more passionate about their "Kurdishness," she says, while there's been an intensification of religious identity among youth from other groups, as noted by experts.
"We'll almost certainly see some further polarization in the Shia-Sunni schism," says Dobbins. "The Sunni will be underrepresented, and unwilling to accord the new regime any legitimacy."
Although not at all convinced that the rising polarization foretells deeper conflict, Ms. Marr does say that it may only be after the elections, in a "huge bargaining session" at the programmed constitutional assembly, that the tensions can be reduced.
In the meantime don't look for the month-long campaign and elections to quell the violence. More important to ending violence, says Marr, will be establishment of a "genuinely Iraqi security force," and progress on economic development.
So far, progress on Iraqis meeting their own security needs has been disappointing, as even President Bush recently acknowledged.
And only minor improvement is anticipated on that score by election day. By then, the US will have 150,000 troops on the ground, assisted by some 25,000 troops from other countries, while trained Iraqi security forces will number no more than 125,000. About 10,000 of those are expected to go on duty over the next month.
Page:
1 | 2




