Revolution in funding health: you
In a few months, many American workers will be handed much more responsibility over their own healthcare. So should they stand up and cheer - or wring their hands?Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
The jury is still out, but one thing seems likely: Consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) are coming. The relentless rise in traditional health-insurance costs - now growing again at double-digit annual rates and far outstripping increases in wages, inflation, or corporate profits - is forcing the move. Businesses, the source of health coverage for 160 million workers and their families, can't absorb the rate increases. So they're raising premiums and reducing coverage, which shifts costs to employees.
That's where CDHPs come in. By next year, as many as one-third of the nation's businesses may be offering them, according to a survey this month by Deloitte Consulting. And that doesn't count the 18 new consumer-driven plans now being introduced to 1.8 million federal government employees. For employers, these plans limit costs because employees choose insurance with high deductibles, usually supplemented by a pot of medical-care dollars supplied by the employer, often called a Health Reimbursement Account.
In theory, the changes ahead should promote more affordable healthcare, say some prominent economists. As employees shoulder a bit more of the cost of their formerly "free" health services, they will demand more and better information about the quality and price of providers (hospitals and doctors). They'll become more interested in steps they can take to prevent illnesses and how they can better manage chronic conditions and avoid costly hospitalization. All of this will drive down costs as the principles of retail economics are finally applied to an industry that economists have seen as a black hole, a void in which simple information - like what medical services really cost and why - is missing.
"I think [consumer-driven healthcare] is going to catch on because there are tremendous market forces pushing us that way," says Glenn Melnick, an expert on health insurance at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. Once consumers make more of their own decisions, they will demand better information.
"How do you know your doctor is any good? You can learn more about a Motel 6 on the Internet than you can about your doctor," he says. A consumer- driven system not only may hold down costs in the largest sector of the United States' economy - $1.4 trillion, or 14 percent - but it "has the potential to ignite a badly needed quality revolution in healthcare as well," he says.
Though CDHPs are too new to draw any conclusions, some early analyses have raised troubling questions. Some worry that people will forgo drugs or medical treatment to save money only to seek more aggressive (and expensive) medical care later. Because of their lower cost, CDHPs might attract young and healthy workers, who don't expect to need medical services, leaving poorer, older, and less healthy people in conventional plans. Taking the healthy out of these plans could push up premiums drastically, creating what some call a "death spiral" for these types of insurance.
Consumers lack sufficient information to make informed choices about the consequences of their selections in CDHPs, concluded a joint report by the consulting firm Mercer and Harvard University in July. Only a minority of these plans monitor employees to make sure that they don't underuse the services.
In fact, they may be. Those who signed up for CDHPs, though similar to other employees in age and gender, used 25 to 50 percent fewer medical services than those who stayed with conventional insurance, suggested a study last month from the Institute for Health Policy at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, Calif.
"While it is still too early to reach any definitive conclusions, current evidence raises significant concerns about relying on consumer-directed healthcare to address high costs, quality-of-care issues, and other fundamental problems in the healthcare system," summarized an August report from the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation in New York that supports research on health and social issues.