Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


We have met the enemy, and he is us

A CIA agent claims that the US war on terror is only strengthening bin Laden

By Faye Bowers / July 13, 2004



The title of this book, "Imperial Hubris," leaves no doubt about what the author thinks of the American war on terror.

Skip to next paragraph

The lack of an immediate response to the 9/11 attacks was inexcusable, he says. The three weeks that the US took to come up with a bombing campaign against Afghanistan allowed Osama bin Laden time to plan his own departure, along with that of most of his fighters.

And the war in Iraq, he writes, is "an avaricious, premeditated, unprovoked war against a foe who posed no immediate threat but whose defeat did offer economic advantages."

The author, a senior intelligence official at the CIA - which insists on keeping him anonymous - criticizes just about everybody, including those in his own agency (perhaps with the exception of his colleagues in the trenches). He censures US action and inaction, as well as both Democratic and Republican administrations.

His purpose, he explains, is to open Americans' eyes about this war on terror - really a global Islamic insurgency, he argues - and to promote a public dialogue about why the US response is failing.

"We face a precise, thoughtful, and hatred-fueled threat meant to win a decisive victory for Allah in a war being waged because of the fighters' love for Him. Bin Laden et. al are and will continue fighting and killing Americans," he writes, "because of what we have done and are doing in the Islamic world and not because of who we are and how we run our political, economic, and social systems."

This book is a follow-up to "Through Our Enemies' Eyes" (reviewed May 29, 2003). That was an exhaustive analysis of bin Laden's written and spoken words over a decade or so leading up to 9/11. This time, the author includes additional rhetoric from bin Laden and his followers, and he presents a balance sheet of bin Laden's and America's successes.

There's no outright winner. The Bush administration claims that two-thirds of the Al Qaeda leadership has been taken out and several attacks have been thwarted.

At the same time, bin Laden and his No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahiri, are alive and regularly issuing audiotapes. Moreover, officials say Al Qaeda is at least as dangerous - or more so - today, and that another, perhaps more catastrophic, attack on the US is highly probable.

The author, whom I have interviewed, claims that America's war on terror strengthens rather than weakens bin Laden. "The US invasion of Iraq is Osama bin Laden's gift from America," he writes, "one he has long and ardently desired, but never realistically expected."

Rather than "on the run," as US officials portray him, bin Laden is comfortably and appreciatively watching US actions and growing his organization - particularly with younger, savvier, computer-literate recruits.

The author devotes one chapter to Afghanistan and what the US should have prepared for leading up to the invasion. He follows with a stinging critique of that effort, claiming that the way the war was fought - with most members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban regime fading into the countryside - will not lead to a long-term victory.

Permissions