- Syrian general gunned down in Damascus
- The Greek debt conundrum, explained
- Helpers in a hostile world: the risk of aid work grows
- Steve Jobs FBI file: four humanizing revelations
- Pressure for Western intervention in Syria builds with fresh assaults (+video)
- Why Egypt may not care about losing US aid
Your own personal monorail?
Imagine a tiny red vehicle traveling 50 miles an hour on a guideway 3 feet wide that winds 20 feet above ground. Another vehicle hums quietly in front.
A half mile later, the car exits the guideway, eases into a station, and stops. There's no driver - everything is automated. The hatch opens, and the passenger walks two blocks to the office.
This is the vision of inventors of personal rapid transit, or PRT, systems. PRT arrives on demand and isn't tied to a schedule. Like taxis, the cars are private and the trips are nonstop.
Proponents say that PRT could change the face of mass transit in the world's cities within a few decades by combining the convenience of a taxi with the automated, traffic-free flow of a subway system. However, as with any new technology, there are concerns about the costs and logistics of building such a system as well as its visual impact on a skyline.
Two systems are being tested on guideways in Cardiff, Wales, and Fridley, Minn. Minneapolis city councilman Dean Zimmerman is proposing a system for his city. Lawmakers in Duluth, Minn., also are exploring whether to implement PRT, says Dennis Jensen, CEO of the Duluth Transit Authority (DTA).
"I see it as a solution to some of the transportation issues we have with connecting the parks on the lakeshore with downtown," says Mr. Jensen. "But the city council sees it also as an economic development opportunity. If we build the test track here, we have a good chance of getting the manufacturing jobs that will likely come with it."
Jensen argues that PRT would augment rather than replace transit options.
Passenger and safety tests of PRT systems in Britain and other European countries were completed in August, and transit officials there are considering whether to build them. The Welsh government and the European Union's City of Tomorrow Programme, an urban development group, have spent millions of euros evaluating systems for Cardiff as well as for Almelo, Netherlands; Huddinge, Sweden; and Ciampino, Italy.
Since the cars are small, their elevated guideways can be erected on modest-sized towers or mounted on the sides of buildings. Each car has a computer on board linked to a central-command network. Empty cars would be routed to the station with the fewest cars, say the designers, so there would be little or no wait. Passengers swipe prepaid cards to board.
"We think this year will be the tipping point," says J. Edward Anderson, CEO of PRT developer Taxi 2000, based in Fridley, Minn. He waits in his office for a group of Minnesota legislators to ride a 60-foot test guideway in his factory. "There are six bills on PRT in the legislature...."
Taxi 2000 and Advanced Transport Systems, based in Cardiff, are among a handful of developers working on the technology.
Support for the systems is not unanimous, however.
In the US and Europe there are questions surrounding where to build a large outdoor test track and how to come up with the money to fully implement PRT. And in Minnesota and other states, there has been debate about PRT's merits.
Page: 1 | 2 



