Where do women out-earn men? Hint: not a city.

Sometimes, a county is so small and the female earning edge so thin it's hard to say what's going on. Take Glasscock County in Texas (pop. 1,406; female advantage: $83 a year). Because the census only samples every sixth household for its income data, a mere $83 difference falls within the Census Bureau's margin of error. "It's very difficult" to draw conclusions from such small samples, says Steve Murdock, the Texas state demographer at Texas A&M University in College Station.

In other counties, unusual local conditions distort the numbers. For instance, demographers discount the two urban counties because they contain unusual local institutions. In Lexington, Va., (a city that operates like a county under Virginia's arcane system) a military academy undoubtedly pushes down the averages for males working part-time, says Julia Martin, a demographer at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. Ditto for Sussex County, Va., which has just been added to the Richmond metro area and contains two maximum-security prisons for men.

Of the counties where full-time working women hold an advantage, seven boast a gap of at least $1,000 a year. All are rural, isolated, and sparsely populated. Six lie in the Great Plains. Most are small, especially King County (pop. 356). But even with such a small sample, King County's pay disparity between full-time working women and men is so large that it remains statistically significant, says Kirby Posey, a survey statistician with the Census Bureau who examined the numbers.

Perhaps the biggest clue to women's success in these counties lies in the career choices they and their spouses make. In all seven counties, at least a third of the men work in agriculture or related industries (such as commercial fishing in the Aleutians East Borough). At least a third of the women, meanwhile, work in healthcare, education, or government. (In the Aleutians, a quarter hold such jobs.) This trend mirrors a larger migration among all rural women to nonfarm service jobs.

"Many folks would be surprised to see the strong leadership roles women have taken in some of the most rural communities," says Chuck Hassebrook, director of the Center for Rural Affairs, a rural advocacy group in Walthill, Neb. They run for public office. They start small businesses. "In farming and ranching communities ... they've always played a critical economic role beyond just managing the household."

The move to jobs off the farm may make that economic role more visible, he adds. And as the fortunes of agriculture have waned, women's steady salaries have become more important. "It's not unusual that the wife with an off-farm job earns more than the farmer," Mr. Hassebrook says. "The real distinction may not be that women make more in those counties, but that men make less."

Of the 90 or so male workers in tiny King County, half work in agriculture (primarily ranching). Of the 59 working women, two-thirds labor in the schools or in local government. Four of the county's top elected posts - treasurer, tax assessor, clerk, and justice of the peace - are held by women. And because of the region's oil money, the county can afford to pay its 11 female teachers more than average.

The fact that local women earn more doesn't seem to have deflated any Texas-sized male egos - at least, not yet. "It doesn't bother me a bit," says County Judge Duane Daniel.

The difference in median income between the genders, using 1999 data for full-time, year-round workers:

King (Texas) $8,790

Golden Valley (Montana) 5,035

Aleutians East Borough (Alaska) 3,484

Ziebach (South Dakota) 2,129

Blaine (Nebraska) 2,083

Bent (Colorado) 1,506

Crowley (Colorado) 1,107

Source: Census 2000

Page: 1 | 2