Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Capturing the Passion

A new film by Mel Gibson, to be released next year, depicts Jesus' last few hours. Jews and Catholics are raising concerns about its potential for stoking anti-Semitism.

By Jane LampmanStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / July 10, 2003

The last time Mel Gibson felt really passionate about directing a film he won the Oscar, and "Braveheart" became a global blockbuster. This time it's a more personal passion: a movie arising out of a rediscovery of his faith. Without studio backing - he's funding it himself - he hopes his film on the last hours of Jesus' life will have a much greater impact.

Skip to next paragraph

"My hope is that this movie has a ... message of tremendous courage and sacrifice [and] that it will affect people on a profound level and somehow change them," he recently told a Christian website.

While the movie is not quite in final shape, "The Passion" already has had an unforseen impact - stirring concerns about the potential of this latest version of the passion play to provoke anti-Semitism.

"He's an international icon and does movies which deliver messages that reach the world, so it's of great concern," says Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League.

ADL and an ad hoc group of Jewish and Catholic scholars have stirred debate over "The Passion" by reviewing a "leaked" early version of the screenplay. What they read prompted an 18-page report sent to Gibson and a public airing of their concern.

As the dramatic story of the trial, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus, the passion play has for centuries been powerful and popular entertainment - on stage and screen - in the Christian world. But historically, productions have reflected negative images of Jews and the long-time church teaching that the Jewish people were collectively responsible for Jesus' death. Violence against Jews as "Christ-killers" often flared in their wake.

While the Catholic church officially repudiated the concept of collective Jewish guilt in 1965, and most Protestant churches have followed suit, the shift has not yet fully permeated popular thought.

Encouraging sensitivity

Jewish and Christian leaders have felt compelled to engage with those producing passion plays - from "Jesus Christ Superstar" to stagings at Oberammergau and US tourist spots to local church performances - to encourage greater understanding and sensitivity.

Gibson's film comes at a time of intense concern among Jews, as anti-Semitism has already surged for other reasons in several countries, especially in Europe and the Muslim world.

The film star had stated his intent to present the passion story "just the way it happened" based on the Gospels - with dialogue in Aramaic and Latin and including vivid depictions of Jesus' scourging and brutal treatment.

Part of the stir apparently arises from the fact that Gibson comes from a family of "traditional Catholics" - which, in general, do not accept the teachings of the church since Vatican II. (He has built a church in California, for example, where the mass is held in Latin.)

It was at that Second Vatican Council that the Catholic church, among other key steps, repudiated the "deicide" charge, the collective guilt of Jews and the idea that they were cursed by God for the crime.

In addition, in a New York Times interview last March, Gibson's father caused dismay by saying that the Holocaust did not happen. There were also reports that the director relied not only on the Gospels, but on non-scriptural Catholic sources from a period tinged by anti-Semitism.

"All this is enough to raise the level of anxiety on what this may be about," Mr. Foxman says.

Gibson's Icon Productions responded by threatening to sue over the "stolen" screenplay, which it said did not represent the nature of the final film.

"To be certain, neither I nor my film are anti-Semitic," the star said in a statement. "Anti-Semitism is not only contrary to my personal beliefs; it is also contrary to the core message of my movie ... [which is] meant to inspire, not offend."

"A lot of people have been quick to jump to conclusions, and unjustly so," says Alan Nierob, Gibson's publicist, in a phone interview. "I'm a second-generation Holocaust survivor. Do I feel there is reason to be concerned? I do not."

Initial statements suggested that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops had also been involved - a staff member helped organize the screenplay review by the scholars - but the USCCB apologized to Gibson and distanced itself from the project, saying it hadn't authorized the group. The Catholic scholars have stood by their concerns, however, though they have returned the script and agreed not to discuss it publicly.

Since the shift in teaching at Vatican II, Catholics and Jews have engaged in extensive dialogue. The church has revised its religious education materials, and Pope John Paul II has made strengthening Jewish relations a priority.

In 1988, US bishops issued a guide specifically on the presentation of Jews in passion plays.

While Christians might assume that relying on the Gospels would be a satisfactory approach, scholars say that the four Gospels tell the story differently, and combining elements from them can be misleading.