- Amnesty International report brands Libya's militias 'out of control'
- Obama proposes bringing jobs home from overseas. Would his plan work?
- Obama's NASA budget: Mars takes a hit, but space science isn't dead
- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down? (+video)
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
- Angry Birds joins Facebook in bid to reach 800 million users
Pomp versus practicality
Two hundred years ago, the size of the United States doubled overnight when two starkly different men signed the Louisiana Purchase, a deal that paved the way for an expansive America.
To commemorate this bicentennial, the New Orleans Museum of Art is presenting "Jefferson's America & Napoleon's France." The exhibition, the largest in the museum's history, contrasts the lives of the two men responsible for engineering the unprecedented land deal, Thomas Jefferson and Napoleon Bonaparte. On view are more than 260 works of art, furniture, documents, ornate weaponry, jewelry, and native American objects from America and France in 1803 loaned by more than 100 museums and private lenders.
"Both Jefferson and Napoleon were preoccupied with how their visions of nation would be given concrete expression in art," says Gail Feigenbaum, the exhibition's curator. "The imperial grandeur of Napoleon's portraits next to the sober, republican portrayals of Jefferson drive home an unforgettable lesson in the power and eloquence of images."
Driven by dreams of westward expansion, in 1803 Jefferson sent an envoy to Paris to solicit Napoleon to sell the vital port city of New Orleans. After pondering the proposal, Napoleon countered with a more fantastic pitch. For $15 million, Napoleon would agree to sell all 900,000 square miles of the Louisiana Territory. Historians say he was motivated largely by the need to finance his vast European military ventures. Eventually, the territory would become all or part of 17 states.
Although the exhibition does juxtapose the lives of these great men, it does not try to judge the character of each man. For example, the exhibition only briefly touches on Jefferson's ownership of slaves and his alleged relationship with Sally Hemings.
What is clear from the exhibition is both men were immensely concerned with public image, and paid deliberate attention to the way they were represented in art. Jefferson sought to present himself as a man of the people. "When Jefferson was inaugurated president in 1801, the 'style' of the American republic was a contested issue," Feigenbaum says. "Jefferson pointedly rejected the pomp and elegance of his predecessor, John Adams, as too reminiscent of hated monarchy." Portraits of Jefferson portray strong images of reserved dignity with typical American informality, as if to eschew the showiness of European monarchs.
In Rembrandt Peale's "Portrait of Thomas Jefferson," the author of the Declaration of Independence is presented as a man of thought, dressed in leisurely attire. And in Gilbert Stuart's portrait, the president, shown sitting at a desk, is idealized as an exemplar of republican virtues and public service.
Page: 1 | 2 



