Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Hollywood ramps up its scare tactics

By Lisa Leigh ConnorsStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / February 28, 2003

Red is the hot color this month - not only on the fashion runway, but on Hollywood sets as well.

Skip to next paragraph

A quick perusal of a TV Guide confirms the trend, even on network TV: Earlier this month, "Fear Factor" contestants bobbed for objects in 50 gallons of cows' blood. Last month on "24," one of the good guys was hacked to death with an electric chainsaw. The torture techniques on "Alias" have become so refined that the torturer usually has to explain what's going on to the viewing audience at home.

But the small-screen carnage pales in comparison with the footage scheduled for the big screen. A single scene in a new Quentin Tarantino movie required 100 gallons of fake blood. Scores of moviegoers ran for the exits during an early screening of a new French film. And a horror film slated for release this spring contains enough "sadistic" violence to have caused one studio to pull it from its schedule.

Horror films have been spooking audiences since Bela Lugosi made his big-screen debut in 1917, but critics say the current roster of films takes gore to a whole new level. They point to a range of possible causes - from ever more realistic special effects to a ratings system that is more lenient on violence than sex. Also, increasingly graphic violence on network TV may be causing filmmakers to up the shock quotient in an effort to get people to buy tickets for what they can see for free at home.

"The bar keeps being raised.... With all the special effects and new technology, you can bump it up another level," says Kenn Viselman, founder of a family entertainment company in New York. "If you've already seen a decapitation, 'Well, we saw that already.' Now you have to find a way to do a double decapitation, or it's not cool."

Another reason the gore may seem even more pronounced is that the events of Sept. 11 had made studios squeamish about trafficking in carnage - but only for a little while.

Prior to that, in 2000 Congress hauled studios over the coals for marketing R-rated material to teens. The year after, 12 horror films were released, a drop of 30 percent. This year, 13 are set to be released.

Since viewers under 25 (primarily teenagers) make up the audience at a typical horror film, R-rated gory films were less attractive financially to studios.

The most recent wave of hit scary movies, from "The Sixth Sense" to "The Others," relied more on suggestion than outright gore. But there are increasing signs that the gloves are coming off - such as this month's "Final Destination 2," which features Death dispatching young, comely actors in a variety of gruesome ways.

At least one expert sees two simultaneous trends: fewer horror films overall, but more extreme gore in the R-rated ones. "We've seen a shift toward a lot of films going for the PG-13 rating," says Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations Co., in Encino, Calif. "Studios are toning down the violence hoping to attract a younger audience. What they're trying to do is make more money.

"On the flip side," he says, "there's still the R-rated horror movies, which are still in vogue. There's an audience ... who doesn't want the homogenized, watered-down horror. They are looking for the outrageous stuff."

'Irréversible' damage?

One movie that's raised the bar to extreme heights is next week's "Irréversible." Directed by Gaspar Noé, the French film - which opens with a brutal murder and has a nine-minute rape scene - caused 250 people to flee for the exit when it debuted at the Cannes Film Festival last year. Several filmgoers reportedly required oxygen to recover from the experience.

But Mr. Noé says he wouldn't have had it any other way.

"You don't do a movie to make people walk out [in disgust]," says Noé. "You just say, 'I want to do the violent scenes really violent.' That's the only useful way to do it.... I could not think of doing a rape scene that would not be painful. Otherwise, you're not [thinking about] what you're shooting, what you're representing."

Mr. Dergarabedian points out that "Irréversible" isn't rated and can "fly in under the radar screen."