Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

US rethinks North Korea strategy

Wednesday, Pyongyang rejected US offers of dialogue as 'deceptive drama' and dismissed possible aid incentives.



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / January 16, 2003

WASHINGTON

Since the nuclear standoff with North Korea began last month, Washington has repeatedly rejected making any move that would appear to reward Pyongyang.

But now, under pressure from regional allies to take conciliatory steps - and eager to remove any distractions from its current focus on Iraq - the United States is inching toward engagement.

The US is trying to curry favor with its allies and partners in the region, especially with South Korea and China, so that they take on more of the diplomatic burden. This would make the crisis less of a US-North Korea affair.

"American policy has tended to be unprepared for the North Koreans - and then to reward them when they misbehaved - and we want to get out of that cycle," says Doug- las Bandow, a Korea expert at the Cato Institute in Washington. "I think we are trying to set a new precedent, that positive responses will be rewarded. But breaking old habits isn't easy."

And the policy change may require direct talks - an option that Washington has considered anathema amid President Bush's personal condemnation of the North Korean regime. The US slide toward engagement, although favored in the region, is also meeting some resistance at home.

President Bush signaled a sharp shift away from his "no deals with evil" policy when he indicated Tuesday that North Korea could expect rewards in the form of food aid, energy, and even perhaps diplomatic relations down the road, if it relinquishes its nuclear weapons programs.

The surprisingly conciliatory language from the US comes as one high-level State Department official is in the region, and another is set to visit next week. Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly was sent primarily to buck up US-South Korean relations, under increasing pressure from the crisis; while next week Undersecretary of State John Bolton will hold talks with Chinese officials in Beijing.

Mr. Bolton's task will be to encourage China - North Korea's principal ally and patron, providing most of the struggling nation's food aid and other assistance - to use its leverage constructively with the North. The US wants to play on China's ambitions for higher regional status as a way to encourage the country to take on more responsibility for the region's stability, State Department officials say.

China, which firmly opposes a nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, this week offered to host talks between Washington and Pyongyang, saying dialogue is the best way to resolve the standoff.

But North Korea's Foreign Ministry released a statement yesterday rejecting the idea of talks with the US. "It is clear that the US talk about dialogue is nothing but a deceptive drama to mislead world public opinion," said the statement, which went on to say that "the US loudmouthed supply of energy and food aid are like a painted cake pie in the sky, as they are possible only after [North Korea] is totally disarmed."

Given similar vitriolic rhetoric which greeted other conciliatory American gestures in recent weeks, the idea of engagement is tough.

Senators press 'get tough' tack

A bipartisan group of senators is pressuring the Bush administration to take off the gloves and get tough with North Korea. Calling their approach a "new strategy" for dealing with the crisis - as opposed to what Bush says is his "bold initiative" - the senators, including Republican John McCain of Arizona and Democrat Evan Bayh of Indiana, this week introduced legislation that would end any aid to the North and reinstate US sanctions.

The bill also urges the administration to toughen sanctions by interdicting North Korean weapons shipments - a chief source of income for the struggling country - and to step up Radio Free Asia broadcasts.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions