Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Democrats want public to vote wallet, not Iraq



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Gail Russell Chaddock, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / October 15, 2002

OMAHA, NEB., AND WASHINGTON

Feelings ran high when Nebraska congressional hopeful Jim Simon summoned a living room full of senior citizens to talk about the economy.

"If you could do anything to see that [former Enron chairman] Ken Lay goes to prison for the rest of his life, or maybe death by hanging, I'd vote for that," said the lady in the cardigan sweater set. "Or hard labor!" chimed in Doris Cutler.

Mr. Simon, a dotcom millionaire and the only Nebraska Democrat with even a long shot at a House seat, says that Omaha residents are "really feeling the negative effects of this economy." He and other Democrats wanted to ride such concerns to victory in the November elections. Instead, they found fall campaigns dominated by talk of war with Iraq.

But with a tough congressional vote on Iraq now out of the way, Democrats are hoping to turn the subject back to the domestic issues they expect to do well on, especially the slumping economy. With 21 days to the election – and control of both the House and Senate on the line – they hope it's not too late.

"Iraq has dominated the last month-and-a-half, and it has been tough to get the electorate focused on the economy," says Simon's campaign manager Adam Gouttierre.

"But since the congressional vote last week, we've been getting calls about pensions and the economy again. Luckily, we planned our debates in the last three weeks, so we'll be able to get back to the economy. And if people go in to the booth thinking about the economy, they'll vote for us," he adds.

Getting back on message

Ever since Iraq emerged as an issue, campaign consultants have been urging Democrats in Congress to resolve the war debate quickly so it wouldn't suck the oxygen out of domestic issues in the campaign. Democracy Corps, a Democratic strategy group, circulated a memo advising Democrats how to argue their case (either for or against the war) "in a way that allows the election to move to domestic issues."

"It's been hard to get voters' attention, because [the war] drowns out other debates," says Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. "People out in campaigns are surprised at the degree to which Democrats in Washington keep actively debating the war instead of getting it off the agenda. It's been a tension within our party."

Now it appears that Democrats in Washington are listening. Within hours of last week's lopsided votes in favor of a resolution to use military force in Iraq, Capitol Hill Democrats convened a summit to jumpstart a national debate on the economy.

"The president has focused the attention of Congress on matters affecting national security for some many months. That is important and deadly serious business," said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D) of North Dakota, chairman of the Democratic Policy Committee, on Friday.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions