Commentary>The Monitor's View
from the September 04, 2002 edition

To Inspect or Not to Inspect

Much has been said about the need for the Bush administration to make the case publicly that an invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein would be justified. Such a justification, wrought out in open debate, is in fact critical.
E-mail this story
Write a letter to the Editor
Printer-friendly version
Related stories:
06/03/02
04/19/02
03/07/02
03/14/01
02/21/01

Get all the Monitor's headlines by e-mail.
Subscribe for free.

The alternative to an invasion, presumably, would be resumption of international arms inspections in Iraq. Those favoring that approach – most recently including Secretary of State Colin Powell – have their own justifying to do.

The argument against resumed inspections is, essentially, that Mr. Hussein has become so adept at hiding his weapons programs that no amount of inspecting could unearth everything. So why bother? Moreover, the Iraqi leader is wedded to weapons of mass destruction, and the only way to ensure that Iraq never makes such arms operational is to get rid of Hussein.

Some strong voices, including former UN arms inspectors who served in Iraq, say that point of view ignores the substantial work already accomplished by inspectors, whom Iraq forced to exit in 1998. These experts claim that up to 95 percent of Hussein's chemical, biological, and nuclear capabilities were destroyed by inspection teams through the 1990s. Some rebuilding has taken place since '98, certainly, but renewed inspections could, in their view, again restrain Hussein's military ambitions.

Secretary Powell has called fresh inspections an important "first step." The inevitable question is, toward what?

The administration was quick to assert that the secretary's statement was not at odds with earlier words from Vice President Cheney and others backing Hussein's removal and questioning the effectiveness of inspections. Inspections, however, could just be one element in seeing that the Iraqi dictator lives up to his post-Gulf War obligations, or else.

A logical next step for the US might be to press vigorously at the UN for a new, no-holds-barred inspection regime that would force Baghdad to open its doors again or find out what "else" means.

The inspections card is on the table. It should be carefully played.




Get Monitor stories by e-mail:
(Your e-mail address will be protected by csmonitor.com's tough privacy policy.)
(Mary Knox Merrill/Staff)
EDITOR'S PICK Five cities that will rise in the New Economy
From Seattle to Huntsville, Ala., five cities are poised to prosper in the New Economy because of exports, innovation, clean technology, and healthcare.
POLITICS Patchwork Nation
The American voter beyond red and blue

Daily podcast

Monitor Reports

Discussions with Monitor reporters from around the world


Today

Pat Murphy

Kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit could be on his way home.




Making a difference
Making a Difference

What happens when ordinary people decide to pay it forward? Extraordinary change. See how individuals are making a difference, finding solutions, overcoming adversity, and giving back globally.

Richard Berry stands in a former Sunday School classroom in the basement of Trinity Evangelical Free Church. The room has been turned into a men's homeless shelter.

Sarah Beth Glicksteen

A church that is home to the homeless

Pastor Richard Berry lives the motto 'faith without works is dead'