Media and Rape Victims

Last week's abduction of two teenage girls in California brought to light a common practice among journalists: No reporting of a rape victim's name.

But a peculiar thing happened in this case. The names and pictures of the girls had already been widely distributed – to help find them – when, after their rescue, a sheriff said they had been raped during the abduction.

"What to do now?" asked many journalists. Would the standard hold of not stigmatizing a victim?

Many media stuck to their rule and didn't refer to the girls by name, which this newspaper applauds, based on its own objective, which is "to injure no man, but to bless all mankind."

But the media could use this case to ask if such self-restraint should be extended, say, by avoiding personal descriptions that have nothing to do with a person's actions, or more carefully judging how the bright lights of publicity might harm the innocent.

Truth-seeking and self-restraint are not incompatible for journalists.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK