Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

Another week, another kids' movie



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Daniel M. Kimmel, Stephanie Cook / August 2, 2002

Until recently, parents who wanted to take their kids to the movies during the summer typically had one option: The latest Disney film.

But this year, families could have spent their whole summer vacation at the cineplex. Starting June 14 with "Scooby Doo," there has been at least one G or PG-rated film released every week.

This weekend is a prime example, with Dana Carvey's "Master of Disguise," opening today and "Spy Kids 2: The Island of Lost Dreams" bowing on Wednesday. Fifteen children's films have been released so far this year, and eight more are scheduled in the next four months (see chart). This is 10 more than last year, and nearly five times as many as in 1995.

Planning outings this summer has been a lot easier, says Bill White, the father of two boys. "There's always something in the next couple of weeks that we're all going to see."

Hollywood has finally noticed that the family that plays together, pays together, say pop-culture experts. Indeed, the three top-grossing films from last year were "Shrek," "Monsters, Inc.," and "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone." This summer's "Lilo & Stitch" and "Scooby Doo" already have scampered beyond the $100 million mark.

The reason for the growth of the family-friendly film is simple, says James Tharp, head of distribution for DreamWorks (which released "Shrek" and this summer's "Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron"). From Hollywood's perspective, there's no difference between a family film and any other kind of movie.

"The entire industry measures success the same way: whether it's profitable," he says.

While Hollywood has discovered that computer-animated mice, child spies, and blue aliens cost less money to make and can be very profitable indeed, parents should take note that the industry is targeting their kids more than ever, some critics warn.

It is certainly nice for families to have more choices, but they aren't all of the same quality. With a glut of films comes fare that ranges from live action to fairy-tale films to straight-to-video sequels with weak plots and cheap animation, says James Rocchi, a film critic for Netflix.com.

"Because there are so many people [in Hollywood] chasing dollars, you get a spectrum," Mr. Rocchi says. "You have Stuart Little 2, which is beautifully animated. Then Disney does a bunch of direct-to-video stuff."

It has taken a decade's worth of momentum to create such a wide variety of family films, says Ray Greene,author of "Hollywood Migraine: The Inside Story of a Decade in Film."

For 70 years, children's entertainment meant Disney films, he explains. Other studios left the market alone.

Then, when "The Little Mermaid," made $74 million in 1989, they took notice. When "The Lion King" raked in $313 million in 1994, they opened up their own animation divisions.

It's taken DreamWorks and the other studios several years to establish themselves as viable alternatives in the public's mind. At first, even the most critically beloved fare, such as "Iron Giant," failed to live up to larger-than-life billing at the box office.

"We now have massive hits that aren't Disney," says Mr. Green – such as this year's "Ice Age" and a certain green ogre.

But even a modest kids' film can have a profitable afterlife, thanks to home video and DVD. For example, top video sellers in June included such iffy theatrical offerings as "Snow Dogs" and "Max Keeble's Big Move," according to Video Business Age.

Children will watch a film until either the tape or their parents' patience wears out. So the home-video market – once seen merely as an opportunity to squeeze a few more dollars out of a movie – has become the tail that wags the dog.

The fact that kids don't mind sequels also offers the chance for studios to spin gold out of box-office straw for years. Take "Air Bud," a 1997 movie about an athletically inclined golden retriever. That dog is still making his way through the sports world, with three direct-to-video sequels.

Another tactic is cross-promotion with children's TV programs. For instance, "Powerpuff Girls: The Movie," released last month, is based on the popular Cartoon Network series.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions