Pressure mounts to overhaul FBI
Missteps could lead the agency to change focus. But are Americans ready for more domestic intelligence gathering?
As Washington continues to rev up investigations into whether the US government could have stopped the Sept. 11 attacks, one agency is getting ever more scrutiny: the Federal Bureau of Investigation.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
It was within the FBI that two of the most glaring apparent lapses occurred: failing to follow up on an internal tip about Arab men training at US flight schools and not authorizing a search of the computer of a Minnesota man suspected of terrorist ties.
Evidence of FBI missteps is generating political pressure to reshape the crime-busting bureau into a kind of domestic terror shield or create a new domestic intelligence agency to take on that role.
At issue is not just whether the agency is capable of reforming itself, but also whether Americans are ready to accept an expanded level of domestic intelligence-gathering.
"It's almost as if the entire agency has to be restructured from the bottom up and my suspicion is that's what Congress will demand," says Marshall Wittmann, a congressional analyst at the Hudson Institute here.
Already, the pressure has led to some reforms. Director Robert Mueller is expanding the FBI's analysis divisions, importing more than 25 CIA agents to help guide reforms, and buying banks of new computers. Observers say he's also trying to bust up a culture of caution and turf-guarding.
But the bureau's history may be working against him.
That history includes rivalry with the CIA, bungled cases, and a legacy of solving more than preventing crimes.
Also, in contrast to the CIA, the bureau's domestic beat has made it wary of infringing civil liberties in its efforts to hunt down criminals. Warrants to search computers, for example, were rarely granted before Sept. 11 as the FBI sought to avoid abusing its powers.
The effort to search the computer hard drive of so-called "20th hijacker" Zacarias Moussaoui was detailed in a blistering memo from Coleen Rowley, the FBI's general counsel in Minneapolis, accusing headquarters of blocking a key terrorism investigation before Sept. 11 and concealing its efforts afterward.
"I have deep concerns that a delicate and subtle shading/skewing of facts by you and others at the highest levels of F.B.I. management has occurred and is occurring," Ms. Rowley wrote to Director Mueller, according to a copy obtained by Time magazine.
Now, congressional intelligence committees and possibly a broader blue-ribbon panel are set to launch full-scale investigations and are demanding change at the FBI.
"I just think they've got to go through a big learning curve, a lot of readjustment," said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss (R) of Florida on "Fox News Sunday."
But criticism and calls for reform are hardly new.
From the days of J. Edgar Hoover the FBI director who kept secret files on Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and many others through the 1990s, the FBI has long been criticized.