Hardliner winning in Colombia

Tired of nearly four decades of guerrilla war, Colombians turned in 1998 to the presidential candidate who promised peace, and Andrés Pastrana was carried to victory on the wings of a dove.

Four years later that bird has flown, and in Sunday's presidential elections, Colombians are set to turn to a much more hawkish alternative in Alvaro Uribe Vélez.

Campaigning on a platform of security, anticorruption, and zero tolerance for the nearly daily atrocities, Mr. Uribe offers to those he calls "the violent ones" bullets instead of conversations, and to Colombians a strong state in the place of a weak and often absent one. He appears certain to win – either outright on Sunday or in a runoff three weeks later – because fed-up Colombians are ready for a show of strength.

"Uribe will mean more war at first, but so be it if that gets rid of the violent ones and lets us start to make something of Colombia," says Angela Narvaez, a Bogotá architecture student.

The public's association of Uribe with more war is a red flag for some observers, who say the conflict – where lucrative cocaine, kidnapping, and arms trades have displaced the original Marxist social causes, and which increasingly has become a "privatized" war pitting more than 25,000 guerrillas against 12,000 paramilitaries – can't be won militarily.

"Enthusiasm for peace took Pastrana to the presidency, and what worries many of us is that now a similar enthusiasm for war is about to do the same for Uribe," says Marco Romero, a political analyst and human rights specialist here. "That sets the stage for another bout of disappointment."

Colombia has often been dismissed as a hotbed of irrational violence that seems never to yield. In the 1990 presidential campaign, three candidates were assassinated. But Sunday's election holds implications for everything from US relations with the region to prospects for democracy in Latin America.

Already under the Clinton administration, Colombia – by far the leading supplier of illicit drugs to the US – became the third-largest recipient of US aid after Israel and Egypt. Now the Bush administration is proposing new aid, and a change in legislation to allow US military aid to be used not just in counternarcotics operations but against Colombia's subversive groups as well.

With Uribe saying he will seek even more international aid to carry out his plans, both domestic and international scrutiny is sure to intensify – especially on how a security-focused president from a wealthy, land-owning family deals with Colombia's growing right-wing paramilitary armies.

Rumors of Uribe's links to paramilitaries from his days as governor of Antioquia have dogged his campaign, as have rumors of family links to drug traffickers. In that context an Uribe plan to create a civilian security force – a kind of neighborhood watch to provide the army and police with "a million eyes and ears" to warn of subversive groups' movements – raises eyebrows.

So does the fact that paramilitary leaders only slightly veil their support for Uribe – a precaution not even taken by dozens of newly elected members of Congress, whom paramilitary leaders brag are in their camp. So far no clear links have been revealed.

Still, for some observers, the company Uribe has chosen to keep is one of the candidate's most troubling enigmas. Says one US embassy official here, "If some Uribe supporters with questionable backgrounds were to have a formal role in an Uribe government, it would cause problems for Uribe both in Colombia and among the international community."

Page: 1 | 2