- $1 billion Empire State Building IPO: why it won't be like Facebook IPO
- In surprise move, GOP leaders admit defeat in payroll tax battle
- More than 30,000 Germans turn out against anti-piracy treaty ACTA
- Does Obama blueprint reduce budget deficit fast enough? (+video)
- Pentagon budget: Does it pit active-duty forces against retirees? (+video)
- Murdoch media crisis deepens with five new arrests
- How Pinterest combines the best parts of Facebook, Tumblr, and Etsy
- US, China face 'trust deficit' as China's heir apparent visits
Learning From Missed Alerts
Since Sept. 11, Americans have grown accustomed to government alerts about possible terrorist attacks. The usual reaction: "So what do we do, exactly?"
The alerts have been often vague, or not specific to a location. And they're so frequent that a certain "cry wolf" complacency has set in.
Such experiences might, then, help Americans put in perspective the news that President Bush and the FBI had been alerted without many specifics about potential threats by Osama bin Laden before 9/11.
Probes by Congress to learn lessons after 9/11 helped bring out the news of these separate warnings to the FBI and the White House. The warning to Mr. Bush included no inkling of suicide attacks on buildings. Still, should he have done more than put intelligence agencies on alert? In hindsight, yes. Would it have stopped the attacks? Highly unlikely.
Caution is a skill made stronger by experience. The need now is to ensure the right lessons are well learned.
