Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

  • Advertisements

A controversial merger and the 'HP Way'



  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions

By Mark Sappenfield, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / December 17, 2001

PALO ALTO, CALIF.

When the time comes for Hewlett-Packard shareholders to vote on the largest merger in the history of the computer industry, Judy Anderson won't hesitate for a moment. Her 500 shares aren't much, she knows, but she'll pledge them all against the effort to join with Compaq Computer.

It's not that the longtime Hewlett-Packard employee dislikes Compaq - or even thinks that the move makes bad financial sense. Rather, she opposes any such merger solely because it's not the "HP Way."

The blockbuster deal is already in peril: Wall Street remains skeptical, and at the beginning of this month, the heirs of founders Dave Packard and Bill Hewlett had pledged their 18 percent of HP stock against the merger.

For many HP employees and shareholders like Ms. Anderson, though, the vote is about much more than the bottom line: It's about the soul of one of America's most storied businesses - the original Silicon Valley start-up.

Laid out by founders who have since been revered as the Lewis and Clark of Silicon Valley, the "HP Way" embraces a love of technology, a bond with the community, and a deep respect for employees. Much of the unanimity, however, ends there, and the Compaq merger has become the touchstone for a debate over what comes next.

Some, including CEO Carleton "Carly" Fiorina, want to stay true to the founders' vision by innovating and reshaping a company that lost its direction in the Internet Age.

HP ceded business during the last decade to companies such as IBM and Dell that found profitable niches in the tech marketplace. Now, HP has to catch up to stay at the vanguard of innovation, and tough decisions are a part of that process, Ms. Fiorina says.

But others look at the estimated 15,000 jobs that would be lost in the merger and wonder whether the nurturing workplace pioneered by Packard and Hewlett - one in which employees voluntarily took unpaid days off so the company could avoid layoffs - will be destroyed.

The conflict is not uncommon in the business world. Companies ranging from Digital Computers to Ford Motor Co. have been torn between the traditions that served well in the past and the need to adjust to a changing marketplace. But widespread concerns that HP is needlessly undermining its unique corporate culture - for a dubious deal - could scuttle the tech world's most ambitious merger to date, and oust America's most powerful woman executive.

"Someone looking to criticize [HP's direction] would find this a particularly opportune moment," says Haim Mendelson, a professor at Sanford University's Graduate School of Business here.

Cultural icon

There has been no shortage of critics. In Silicon Valley, Hewlett-Packard is more than just a busines. It is a cultural icon, and any attempt to tinker with the vision laid out by its founders is akin to revising the Bill of Rights.

Page: 1 | 2 Next Page

  • Print
  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Add This
  • Permissions