A Patient's Decision

An attempt by Attorney General John Ashcroft to block Oregon's voter-approved assisted-suicide law (see story, page 3) raises a flurry of questions.

Should the federal government interfere with state regulation of medical practices? A 1997 US Supreme Court ruling on assisted suicide left the ultimate decision up to the states.

Is Mr. Ashcroft right to apply federal antinarcotics law to drugs used for assisted suicide? Such law can be used to ban "medical marijuana," according to the high court. The drugs used in Oregon are regulated, though not illegal, as marijuana is.

Did philosophical or political positions drive this decision?

Ashcroft and many others oppose assisted suicide on ethical and religious grounds. Indeed, the practice could be abused, with interests other than those of the patient coming into play. And at what point is the possibility of recovery ruled out?

Still, Oregon's law ensures that a patient's conscious choice is paramount. Many people, reportedly, find it comforting to know that they have this option. Cutting it off seems an unneeded intrusion on individual prerogatives, just as suicide itself seems an intrusion on the sanctity of life.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK