- Payroll tax deal close: Why did Republicans back down?
- Israel says Bangkok, Delhi, and Tbilisi attacks all linked – to Iran
- Rick Santorum's new machine-gun ad: Will it work? (+video)
- As Sarkozy seeks new term, French are wary of 'Merkozy' (+video)
- Honduras prison fire kills more than 300, highlights regional problem (+video)
Congress makes it easier to snoop
Big Brother will probably grow bigger under antiterrorism legislation emerging from the United States Congress in response to the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington.
Both the House and the Senate approved bills last week making it easier for intelligence agents to snoop on techno-savvy terrorists.
With just a single warrant, agents will be able to tap all of the telephones or Internet accounts a suspected terrorist uses and get lists of every e-mail address he contacts.
Justice Department officials say the measures are simply a matter of the law catching up with technology at a time when terrorists use disposable cellphones and e-mails locked with encryption software.
But civil libertarians fear these new measures will decrease oversight by judges and tread on citizens' privacy, without necessarily preventing future terrorist attacks.
Lawmakers first reined in domestic spying after Watergate and the end of J. Edgar Hoover's tenure at the Federal Bureau of Investigation by adopting the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978.
Under FISA, military and political intelligence-gathering operates under stricter judicial oversight than before 1978 - and also under rules different from those governing criminal investigations. Intelligence agents are barred from turning their findings over to the police for criminal investigations, but on the other hand, they don't need to present as much evidence to get approval for a wiretap as do their police counterparts.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration proposed loosening many of these constraints on domestic spying as part of a broad antiterrorism bill submitted to Congress.
"Technology has dramatically outpaced our statutes," Attorney General John Aschroft told the House Judiciary Committee. "Law enforcement tools created decades ago were crafted for rotary telephones - not e-mail, the Internet, mobile communications and voice mail."
The Clinton administration unsuccessfully proposed similar changes in 1996 and 1998, says former Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder. This time, Congress will likely approve roving wiretaps for listening in on terrorists.
Instead of obtaining a separate warrant from a different court for each phone line a target uses, investigators would need only one court approval.
E-mail addresses would be treated like phone numbers, allowing the use of technology like "trap and trace" registers that can record every number dialed.
Accessing the contents of the e-mail message, or even the subject heading, would still require a showing of probable cause and a search warrant.
Both House and Senate antiterrorism bills expand the types of investigations that can apply for wiretaps under the less stringent FISA standard. It may now be used only when intelligence gathering is "the primary purpose" of the surveillance. The new legislation would allow the FISA standard to apply to investigations in which intelligence gathering is a "significant purpose."
Page: 1 | 2 



