Congregations respond to terrorist threat
They dig deeper for spiritual wisdom in how to go forward
(Page 2 of 2)
Despite threatening calls and hate mail, the Islamic Society of Boston welcomed more than 700 people to an open house on Sept. 16, because they had also received strong support. "People have been wonderful, coming to the mosque with flowers and accompanying us in prayer," says Yasmine Dabbous. In response to community demand, the society is offering a four-part introductory course on Islam.
The Islamic Society of Greater Houston has formed a new American Alliance for Justice and Peace, involving 37 organizations, with the aim of educating the entire community about diverse faiths. Sikhs and Hindus are joining because they, too, have been targeted, simply because they look different, says Mustafa Tameez, an advertising representative.
A Sikh gas station owner was killed in Mesa, Ariz.; and a Sikh spiritual leader in Virginia, an IFC member, was threatened on the highway by two truck drivers as he was on his way to give blood for victims of the Pentagon attack.
This week, the IFC announced steps toward healing the wounds of such actions and building broader understanding. It will offer new educational programs for children and adults, publish personal essays on each faith, and work to strengthen teaching about religion in the schools. An area workshop for teens to deal with prejudice and stereotypes is planned for Oct. 8. IFC congregations are also forming partnerships with those of other faiths to encourage ongoing interaction.
"We've seen terrible incidents, leading some foreign students to choose to go home," Mr. Lobenstine says, "but there is also an outpouring of calls, of people asking how they can help."
Confronting these concerns and the challenging issues of responding to terrorism at home and abroad, religious leaders are speaking out publicly on the basis of shared values.
Under Mr. Wallis's leadership, a religious response to terrorism called "Deny Them Their Victory" has been prepared. It is to run this week in The New York Times, with the signatures of at least 2,500 clergy from across the US. Their call to action urges sober restraint and limits to military retaliation, asserts some of the values to be pursued in the process, and proposes that houses of worship become public arenas for community discussion and healing.
"The weakest part of the Bush administration's response has been explaining why people [overseas] are so angry," Wallis says in an interview. "We are missing the Lincolnesque quality of calling us to self-examination.
"We need time to reflect together, and religious communities ought to be places where this national conversation takes place," he adds. "The media should act as our town meeting, but so far it hasn't done so."
Lobenstine worries about the tendency to "wrap the flag around our Scriptures" and assume all we do is right. "We need to acknowledge that our policies around the world are a mix of good and bad," he says.
Any policies proposed to strengthen security at home deserve the same careful scrutiny, clergy say. Jewish leaders, for instance, have taken strong public stands, not only against hate crimes, but against any profiling of Arab-Americans.
One Muslim, born and raised in the US, says he was nervous traveling by air this week to visit his father, who is having surgery. "Dad didn't want me to come because some men have been taken off airplanes just because of how they look," he says. He worries that such steps could turn into profiling in every aspect of life.
A Gallup poll this week shows a majority of Americans back profiling of Arabs, and 50 percent support the use of national ID cards.
"While feelings of anger and vengeance are understandable," Wallis says, "we can't allow this to change who we are as a people; we need to respond out of our best values, not out of worst instincts."
Page:
1 | 2




Become part of the Monitor community
10,400 Fans | 4,400 on Twitter | 700K RSS subscribers