Spies That Cross a Line

United States intelligence-gathering is undoubtedly some of the best in the world. While finger-pointing is not appropriate as the nation heals itself, questions as to how 13 intelligence agencies failed to detect the massive attack on Sept. 11 need answers.

Suggestions that technology wasn't adequate, or that there was a lack of coordination and funding, may well be part of the story. But faced now with a sustained campaign to thwart terrorists, the US may need to use more covert spies. That practice declined as the US moved to high-tech surveillance and chose to avoid associating with "unsavory" foreign agents.

In the wake of news that a Guatemalan military officer being paid by the CIA was tied to the murder of a guerrilla in 1995, the CIA wisely approved a policy requiring approval before its field officers could recruit agents known to be human rights violators. It does not forbid hiring others with questionable records.

Still, when does the end justify the means in spying on terrorists? And just exactly what does "unsavory" mean?

The Bush administration and Congress need to fine-tune the ethical answers to these questions. Few Americans would have opposed using "unsavory" foreign agents to learn about plans for the Sept. 11 attacks. And yet, how far does the US want to go in paying such agents again and again, perhaps supporting their evil deeds elsewhere?

Like the requirement to seek court approval for a search warrant, so, too, must US spies continue to seek approval before hiring a foreign agent. That may be difficult while infiltrating a tightly knit, secretive terrorist cell. But US spies cannot operate in an "all rules are off" environment without eroding America's moral standing against the use of terror.

Striking a balance between adequate intelligence and honoring civil liberties won't be easy. Americans should join the debate over how far their government should go in using tactics that may be uncomfortable but necessary.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK