Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

Dad was incredible to me as a child

(Page 2 of 2)

I never knew him when he wasn't a car driver. Vauxhalls were the only make of car he ever bought. (How consistent people were then! My mother never had a dog that wasn't a golden retriever.) And Vauxhalls were distinctive for their long concave flutes along each side of the hood - sort of trilby cars, come to think of it.

Skip to next paragraph

I was not only proud of my father's prowess as a tennis star, I was inordinately proud of our succession of Vauxhalls. Since they were his unvarying preference, they were bound, in my admiring eyes, to be the best cars in the world.

So I knew he drove cars. What I could not imagine was that he had once owned, and actually rode, a motorbike. I really could not bend my concept of Dadhood around that startling notion. He'd have to have been so young and rakish. Yet, again, the family tradition was certain.

I asked him once. "Dad, did you really have a motorbike?" I'm sure my tone was incredulous. He admitted he had.

In fact, he told me about how the elastic band that drove the wheels was always breaking on the most inconvenient occasions, usually when he was miles from home and descending an exceptional gradient. But then the first cars he had, after his callow biker-days had ended, were also mechanically primitive. He'd had to drive them in reverse up the more testing slopes. No other gear was adequate.

Looking back, I'm amazed at how little this rather self-effacing man told his family about his past. We knew - because this much he often said - he was a true Londoner, having been born "to the sound of Bow Bells." We knew he had lived in New Zealand with his parents, brothers, and sister after leaving school. When he'd returned to Britain, only one brother later followed him "home."

Anyway, in my young eyes he was far too old to have ever been a child.

But one thing above all stretched the elastic of my imagination to the doubting point. It illustrates, perhaps, the reason my father didn't dwell on his past. He must have thought of it as another world. Not so much because my mother was his second wife. Or that my two oldest brothers were half-brothers. Or that their mother had died. It was that my father's views and attitudes had in certain ways radically altered through these experiences.

My suspicion is that he had once been far more sociable. We were not exactly reclusive as a family, but I do not think my father had many close friends. There were children's parties for us, but my parents didn't go out.

The most outgoing part of our lives, apart from church, was going to the pictures once a week, with fish and chips as a treat on the way home afterward. But one of the changes in my father's life was that he no longer drank any form of alcohol, and he no longer smoked a pipe. And at that period, not to drink or smoke was a kind of social death in some circles.

So this is what I simply could not imagine my father had ever done. Smoked a pipe. Impossible!

Now, Uncle Dick (my mother's brother) - he smoked a pipe all right. Or at least he made great efforts to do so. The performance, in fact, was a protracted and undeliberate comedy. Boxfuls of matches were struck and went out. Sudden gasping intakes of air followed - great puffings and suckings. However, he rarely managed to light the thing.

But my father? Even attempting to smoke a pipe? It would be easier to imagine he had a mother.

(c) Copyright 2001. The Christian Science Monitor