Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Reconciliation: South Africa's greatest export?

By Elisabetta Anna ColettiStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / August 24, 2000



During the anguished years of apartheid, Dumisa Ntsebeza was detained more times than he can remember. He wrings his massive hands as he recalls the various assassination attempts on his life and violent acts against other South Africans, including the gunning down of his eight-year-old cousin by South African security police.

Skip to next paragraph

Despite his painful experiences, Mr. Ntsebeza isn't vengeful. "I don't have the capacity to hate," the former anti-apartheid activist says.

Ntsebeza, who served as chief investigator for South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, has become an eloquent spokesman urging reconciliation and forgiveness in war-torn parts of Africa. But as Burundi's warring ethnic groups stumble toward a proposed peace agreement, it is uncertain whether Ntsebeza's and South Africa's example of healing will be followed by neighbors on the continent.

On Monday, President Clinton is scheduled to join peace mediator Nelson Mandela in Arusha, Tanzania, to witness the signing of a truce to end Burundi's gruesome civil war between Hutus and Tutsis. Tensions have risen, however, as the deadline for a peace agreement approaches, casting doubt on whether the accord will be signed.

When the fighting in Burundi stops, Ntsebeza believes that the devastated nation should use South Africa's TRC as a model to begin healing rifts in a peaceful way. "No experience of any one country can be exported to any other country, but there is something to be said for South Africa" and its relatively peaceful transition, Ntsebeza says.

True, agrees Pearl Robinson, an Africa expert at Tufts University in Medford, Mass., but the problem is that those negotiating a truce in Burundi are not Burundians. "In Burundi," Dr. Robinson notes, "they are attempting to take a model that worked in South Africa and use external actors as the primary people who are trying to make that model a fit."

Robinson notes that "what finally happened In South Africa was that a racial minority agreed to live under a majority-rule Constitution, protecting minority rights." The same political compromise would have to be reached between the minority Tutsis, who now rule, and the majority Hutus - a difficult proposition.

Ntsebeza has become an ambassador urging nationwide moral self-examination as part of reconciliation. He has received a promise from Nigeria's President Olusegun Obasanjo of full disclosure and compliance in investigations into crimes committed during dictator Sani Abacha's regime. And Ntsebeza was recently in Verona, Italy, where he discussed setting up a TRC to deal with the aftermath of the 1998 Guinea-Bissau rebel uprising. He hopes that the same process can eventually transpire in Sierra Leone, where antigovernment rebels have plunged the country into a civil war.

It is the TRC's honesty process that offers conflicted societies the key to working through divisions instead of returning to bloodshed, Ntsebeza says. "In Sierra Leone, for instance, everyone who was involved in those violations of human rights will be pardoned, without knowing what exactly the person did, how the person did it," he says. "When people are publicly shamed and know that everything that they have done will be open for public scrutiny, they are not likely to repeat the same experiences again."

As South Africa's TRC chief investigator, a position to which he was appointed by Mr. Mandela, the country's first black president, Ntsebeza had less than three years to investigate human rights abuses stretching from 1960, the year of the infamous Sharpeville massacre, when 69 black South Africans were shot dead by police during a nonviolent demonstration, to 1994.